Where there’s muck
there’s even more
money
…
as well as garden
bin price hike, replacement bin charges are sneaked in
Of all the many things there are to get worked up about in
the saga of Worst Street’s greed and incompetence, it’s somehow not surprising
that the stuff that many might regard as the least important creates the biggest
waves.
***
Last week, we drew attention to the debate on the cost of collecting
your garden waste – which seems almost certain to be soaring like the cloud of flies
that emerges each time you open your wheelie bin at this time of year.
***
This week, there’s something new – but it’s all about wheelie
bins yet again … and the charge for a replacement if yours gives up the
ghost or ends up in one of our many local waterways.
***
A reader ‘in the know’ tells us that a proposal to charge £25
for a replacement wheelie bin came as a surprise to the Portfolio Holder for
waste collection.
Quoted as her words were: 'I am not in the loop on this I'll
come back to you, Councillor.’
We were told: “Given that many wheelies have now been sitting
out in the sun for about ten years, and that sun and plastic are not the best long-term
companions, this looks like a charge that will be seen, and probably challenged
by many local community tax payers as a local ‘stealth tax.’
***
So, what’s the bottom line here?
For those of you with time to spare, Worst Street publishes a
snappily-named brochure called: “Waste and Recycling Operational Procedures” –
a list of 25 measures over 19 pages which points out that it has a legal right
to charge for the supply of bins and will do so “in accordance with the
prevailing policy of Cabinet [sic] at the time.”
***
As far as we are aware, that time has never come – until now …
and it is this what is exercising the great and the good of Worst Street.
***
The first mention of charges was made and agreed in February
2013 … back in the days when Tory Councillor Raymond Singleton-McGuire held the
finance portfolio …
... Not only that, but it was recommended for a 20% increase
from the year 2015-2016 – from £25 to £30.
***
One problem seems to be that whilst the charges have been an option
for the past five years, it seems that they have only just been introduced – as
recently as the start of the month – with many councillors in the dark about
what it going on and minded to oppose any such move.
***
Not only that, but waste collection in the borough is a game
of two halves.
***
Worst Street is very proud of avoiding any of what it calls
its non-statutory responsibilities – things that it used to do out of the kindness
of its heart (!) but is not compelled by law to do.
But with the need for economies, scarcely anything of that
nature happens anymore – except of course for things such as spending thousands
of pounds on the office of Mayor, which confers great benefits on … councillors
lucky enough to hold the post (which is most of them if they survive enough
elections.)
***
Garden waste collection falls into this category – which is
why we are expected not only to buy the
bins we use, but pay to have them emptied … despite a cast-iron guarantee that
the service would always be free.
***
Domestic waste is another matter.
Worst Street is obliged to collect this and can even
specify the size and type of bin that must be used.
So, not unreasonably, people are asking why – if the council
has to do this as part of its council tax ‘service’ – it apparently
doesn’t have to provide the bins free as part of that package.
Whatever next – will we see a handling charge for the diesel
expended to drive the dust carts – sorry, freighters?
We wouldn’t be at all surprised.
***
Meanwhile, some info just in …
We hear that there’s been a request for the bin replacement
charges to be considered by an Overview and Scrutiny Committee – but when that
will be is anyone’s guess.
Let’s hope that it’s sooner rather than later, as an estimate
of the money being made from the replacement bin charges is of the order of £10,000
a year.
***
It was sad to read comments by traders in the once-thriving
West Street that more and more shops are closing because business is in a
downward spiral.
But the writer of the report found new leader Aaron Spencer in
buoyant mode … as usual.
He was quoted as saying: “I think we need to be looking at
making Boston a more cosmopolitan type of town.
Come again?
The dictionary defines cosmopolitan as including people from
many different countries – and we have them by the truckload already.
Councillor Spencer went on: “I was recently at the opening of
Sam's Fish and Chip shop and it was great the amount of people who were there.
“As for West Street, we can only do so much as a council and
I believe we have a prosperous future in Boston.
“Businesses will go where the popular area is in the town and
we need to change people's perspectives of the town.
“We need to encourage entrepreneurs and business owners that
we have a prosperous future.
“The problem of anti-social behaviour is one that is rife
across the country and I believe it's a symptom of low-income housing.
“We're looking to find a way of addressing the symptom.”
***
This sort
of response has already become something of a mantra with our leader.
But
analyse what he says, and it doesn’t really bear close examination.
Of course,
there would be a big turn out to the opening of a new shop of any kind –
because people are specially invited.
We recall the
opening two years ago of the mint supermarket by a former mayor amidst great fanfare – and the deafening silence when it closed a year later.
As
for West Street – whilst we forever hear the excuse that the planning
committee cannot reject applications to convert former shops into off licences just because we have too many of them – we are
sure that a cunning planning mind could come up with an obstacle or two.
Allegedly,
we have highly paid council officers whose job it is to encourage entrepreneurs
and persuade business owners that we have a prosperous future.
So why don’t
councillors ask them what they are doing – as they have produced little by way of results to date?
Whilst we asking questions, perhaps Councillor Spencer could
clarify his phrase that the problem of anti-social behaviour is a symptom of low-income
housing – because it makes little sense to us.
And whilst
building better housing may be a partial solution is it not something for the
here and now – and above all else Boston needs some quick fixes before the town
goes down with all hands.
***
Something
that was mentioned by West Street traders – and others in the town of course –
was the issue of street drinking.
***
But you
will be glad to hear that it is no longer a problem.
A report
to this week’s Environment and Performance Committee on crime and disorder
included the annual review of anti-social behaviour and Public Spaces Protect
Order alcohol statistics for 2018/19 tells us that: “thus far in 2019 there
have been 11 incidents reported to police by the public about street drinking.
“I am not saying that street drinking is completely
eradicated, as clearly it does still happen, and probably always will to some degree.
However, we have come a very long way indeed from when powers were first
granted to address the issue.”
That may be true – but is it the case that so few incidents are
reported to the police because potential callers know that nothing will
happen.
That’s what many people say.
***
One small item of interest at last council meeting was a
question about where the market stall covers that once graced The Green have
gone.
The issue was raised by BiG Councillor Brian Rush, who was
reportedly told by Councillor Nigel Welton that he was inclined to think they
didn’t actually exist, and referred to them as ‘myths.’
Brian Rush insisted that they did exist – and we agree with
him, having seen and admired them in the past.
Stuff does go AWOL at Worst Street from time to time – yet we
would have expected a large organisation that spends our money to buy things
might have devised the simple idea of an inventory that includes the location
of items as well.
Which reminds us – never having seen them since they were bought
for £15,000 to hold back the masses lining the route for the 2012 Olympic torch as it passed through Boston – what has become of the crowd control barriers
that we could have hired for a fraction of the price?
***
Finally, our ‘Ideas Above Their Station’ award of the week goes
to Worst Street for the following transparent piece of self-aggrandising tosh.
Worst Street?
A community ‘leader?’
How on earth did they come up with that ludicrous idea?
You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com
E– mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested.
Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com
We are on Twitter – visit @eye_boston
