Monday, 27 January 2020

Trying to keep track of the to-ing and fro-ing at Worst Street after the resignation of leader Aaron Spencer is like trying to reach the centre of a maze by walking through it backwards and blindfolded.

***

In the aftermath of last week’s politicking, Councillor Spencer appeared to be down – but not apparently out.
Following his resignation ahead of last week’s full council meeting after being told that the alternative would be a humiliating vote of no confidence, he fired off an open letter to all members of the council – couched in terms that some might question as a way to win them over.

***

Councillor Spencer wrote: “Now the dust has settled and the true venomous treachery and betrayal of trust from within the Tory group was exposed to me I feel I could no longer lead as a member of that group. So, I took the decision to resign as leader with a very heavy heart, as I really have tried to be a good leader and bring the divide of councillors together. I was basically push [sic] by a small few of the Tory group who for selfish opportunistic reasons decided to make a grap [sic] for power and keep the strangle hold [sic] on the leadership. 
“As I have also stated I wanted us all to work together without divide to make a better boston [sic]. This is what I stand for and truly believe.
“This will not happen if the Tory group are allowed to install a new puppet that I would not be. I urge you as fellow councillors to support me as an independent to lead Boston council again. If you support me there will be a complete shuffle within the cabinet and various positions, giving a true fair and collision [sic] governance for our town and do what’s best for the people of boston [sic] we where [sic] elected for. 
“I sacrificed a full time job offer and only worked 2 months over the Xmas period so I could give 100% to my role . However Nigel and Tom who have wanted to be leader in the past, and mike [sic] who was twisted and showed hatred towards me since my election decided that this gave them a reason for no confidence and when removing mike [sic] from a role because of his total lack of interest at our group meetings the scene was set for the betrayal allowing Tom to run around and obtain some support from a few of you.
“To give Boston the best shot I can ! [sic] I hope you can get behind me and choose me again. This time I can truly lead us all for a better boston [sic].
“Thank you for taking the time to read my email and I will try to call every one of you over the next few days and it will allow me to answer any questions or fears you may have. There will be no lies from my mouth and I hope I can proof [sic] to you that I am the right man. I know I am not as experienced as some of you but I have lots of positive energy to share, and though me I will give your opinion a voice.”

***

We don’t know what you make of this – but it was enough to make one Independent take to social media to give Councillor Spencer his backing.


Interestingly, Councillor Hastie is one of those ‘Independents’ who takes the view that if a councillor quits his group they should resign and fight a by-election.
Yes, really.

***

We also heard that Councillor Spencer held a meeting last Thursday at which he hoped to rally colleagues to back him as an ‘Independent’ leader.

***

Quite how this would work, we don’t know – Councillor Mike Cooper has reunited with the Tory  party after the spat which saw him sacked by Councillor Spencer – and the Conservatives still have a majority.in any case.

***

To appoint Councillor Spencer as the ‘Independent’ leader of the council would require some Tories either absenting themselves from future meetings, abstaining from voting, or deliberately voting against their own party.

***

Whilst the impression exists that recent events came to a head quite suddenly, we understand that the issues concerning Councillor Spencer arose over time and that he was cautioned by his peers a number of times before push came to shove.

***

But one outcome of all this is to have focussed the minds of potential candidates for the Tory leader’s job – with both the current deputy Nigel Welton and planning committee chairman Tom Ashton (whose raising of the sacking of Councillor Cooper brought matters to boiling point) now apparently unwilling to put themselves forward to replace Councillor Spencer.
Who might be left to vie for the job?
Your can make a few guesses yourself, and we think you will agree that the list is not exciting.

***


But we won't have long to wait.
An extraordinary meeting of the council has been called for Monday 3rd February at 6-30pm specifically to appoint a new leader of the council.
It has been called by six councillors   one more than the mininum required by the council's constitution   and can be attended by members of the public ... although they are not allowed to speak.
Given what weve been hearing, it seems likely that five of the councillors wanting the meeting represent the entire Bostonian Independents Group  which includes two battle-scarred veterans of previous leadership encounters   while the sixth would have to be Councillor Spencer.


***

Extraordinary meetings of Boston Borough Council, are, err, extraordinarily rare. The last one was almost two years ago – on 12th February 2018, when Councillor Brian Rush was mayor.
Then, a motion proposed by Councillor Michael Cooper and seconded by Councillor David Brown declared the council’s “deep concern with the actions of the Mayor in posting offensive and political comments on his Facebook page.”
The motion declared that this had “demeaned the great office that is The Worshipful the Mayor of Boston.”
It went on to say that Councillor Rush had “sullied” the role of First Citizen and champion of the Borough with “petty, political point scoring that is factually incorrect” and called on him to resign with immediate effect.
To hammer the point home, an amendment was moved by Councillor Richard Austin and seconded by Councillor Aaron Spencer demanding that if the Mayor refused to quit, officers should withdraw all administrative support for his activities as Mayor for the rest of his term of office.


***

The extraordinary meeting prior to that was at the end of October 2016 – with the happier objective of making a local woman a Freeman of the borough to recognise her years of service to the community.

***

The business conducted may be poles apart – but the variety and rarity of such meetings underlines their importance of these very special meetings

***

Remember, next Mondays meeting is to appoint a leader of the council   not the Conservative group   which presumably will have to get its ducks in a row to appoint their own Number One in double quick time, in the hope and expectation that the winner will also have enough votes on the night to keep control of the council.
If they had three-line whips in local parties then this would be an occasion for one of them.
Hopefully, we'll learn more in the coming week and, if so, will share it with you on the day of the meeting.

***

So … is anything else happening in Worst Street other than some rather unseemly jockeying for power and position?

***

Yes – and it seems that if it doesn’t involve power it involves money.

***

The draft budget for the coming year has just surfaced – with a rise in Worst Street’s share of the council tax being proposed at 2.05%,  just 8p a week more for Band D taxpayers  and we expect it to be touted as the act of a generous council seeking to save our pockets.

***

It sounds quite good, but as always, the devil is in the detail.


Whilst we may think that we are getting away with a reasonable increase – we are paying heavily in other areas.
One of these has been well-aired already – the increase in garden waste collection charges.
According to the draft budget the rise will bring in an extra £166,000 next year – although no further increases are listed for the years up to financial year 2024/2025.
But if you’re planning to die in the coming years – then its time to start saving now.
Bereavement charges are set to increase by £31,000 in the year ahead, then rise steadily by proposed increments of an extra £26k a year in 2021/2 and 2022/3, £30k in 2023/4 and another £27k in the final budgeted year of 2024/2025.
That’s a rise of £140,000 between today and April 2024.

***

Car parking charges are also set to bring in another £29,000 in the financial year ahead.

***

But there’s no limit to the Worst Street imagination when it comes to making money.
It emerged recently that the council had told Boston Woods Trust – which is a registered charity – that from April it must pay to have its bins for litter and dog waste collected from the car parks at its sites.
This has forced the Trust to appeal for at least 100 new members at £20  a year which would cover the shortfall.
If youd like to join, then you can follow the link here   and let them know that you heard about them in Boston Eye.
But we still think that as Worst Street's bin lorries collect in the areas near the woods, the council could make an exception in this particular case.


***


To underline the irony of all this, Worst Street last week declared a climate emergency, which included special mention of the importance of tree-planting. 
The Council provides excellent levels of biodiversity and environmental good practice. The Council is accredited in its management of both country parks and delivers a number of tree planting successes across its parks and grounds estates year on year. The Council continues to increase it’s [sic] activity in these areas and wishes to provide and support others to further this agenda.
Ho-Ho.

***

But the penny-pinching doesn’t end there, apparently.
People wanting planning application information are now going to have to fork out as well.
We hear that the department no longer prints copies of supporting statements.
And whilst taxpayers  can view them on-screen by arrangement in the municipal buildings – assuming they are able-bodied enough to get there and can find somewhere to park – if they want paper copies they must pay on a sliding scale that starts at 10p for a piece of A4 paper and end at £2.10 for a slab of A1.

***

It’s not enough to attack one local charity, by the way – Worst Street has set its sights on others as well.
Until it shut up shop completely – Boston’s Oxfam shop opened at different times to the published hours – and once or twice when we had stuff to drop off, we left it bagged neatly in the doorway.

***

Now Boston Borough Council wants it known that doing this is a crime – regardless of the charity involved.


So, in future, it seems that helping others less fortunate may get you nabbed by the crack team the council employs to nick a handful of people who drop fag ends in the name of keeping the borough clean.
Oh. And what will be done about the rolls of bedding and blankets left overnight in shop doorways to stake a claim for our local beggary when they arrive for their day’s business? No-one seems much bothered about them  or so it appears.

***

The same message is being sent out to people who leave recyclable items beside collecting banks.


“If you find your local recycling bank is full please do not leave the items next to the bin as this is classed as fly-tipping,” says Worst Street blithely, going on to ask people to let them know about a full bank.
If they kept a more thorough eye on them as they should, this problem wouldn’t arise.
But Worst Street has always loved threatening and criminalising people.


***

You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com
E– mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested.
Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com

We are on Twitter – visit @eye_boston

Monday, 20 January 2020

What threatens to be a major row is brewing within the ruling Tory group at Boston Borough Council after a former leader of the council and senior member of the Planning Committee was arbitrarily removed by Worst Street Leader Aaron Spencer.

***


Councillor Mike Cooper, who was succeeded by Councillor Spencer in July last 
year after two years as leader, was sacked without warning –  and without being told – and replaced on the Planning Committee by the recently-returned Councillor David Brown.
Councillor Cooper – who co-incidentally is Councillor Spencer’s joint representative in the Five Villages ward – has now quit the Conservative group – though he remains a card-carrying party member while being listed on WorstWeb, the council website, as “not specified”.

***

The move prompted a high-level dialogue between Planning Committee Chairman Councillor Tom Ashton and the Leader – which culminated with a slap in the face for the entire Conservative group when Councillor Spencer effectively told them: “do as I say or you’re out as well”.

***

Councillor Ashton tackled the issue head-on when he told Councillor Spencer of his “extreme disappointment” at the decision to take Councillor Cooper off the Planning Committee, “and the apparent manner in which this decision was taken.”

***

He went on: “You will undoubtedly be aware from your records that Councillor Cooper enjoys an exemplary record as a member of the Planning Committee with nearly five years’ experience, in addition to having held Portfolio responsibility for Planning and serving as a representative of the Borough Council on the South East Lincolnshire Joint Planning Committee. Councillor Cooper chaired the December meeting of the Planning Committee in my absence and was universally held to have done so successfully.

***

“I would be grateful if you could furnish me with your reasons for the decision you have made, specifically detailing how the decision to replace Councillor Cooper aides [sic]the Planning Committee in the exercise of its duties on behalf of the Local Planning Authority. I am mindful of our requirement as a Regulatory committee responsible for determining high profile and complex planning decisions; and hope you will be able to demonstrate how your decision to remove the most long-standing and best-qualified Conservative member of the Committee accords with these responsibilities.

***

“While I acknowledge your prerogative in determining which members of the Conservative Group serve on which Committees, as Chairman of the Planning Committee and a fellow member of the Conservative Group, good manners and good political sense would have suggested running changes to the Committee composition by me in advance. An even more basic level of courtesy would have been to have ensured I had prior notice of the change you intended to make.

***

“I would take this opportunity to observe that having spoken to Democratic Services this morning, they were under the impression that the decision was made at the Conservative Group meeting on Thursday (January 9thed.).
“Having been at that meeting and able to affirm that no discussion of Planning Committee places took place, could you possibly explain how Democratic Services came to be labouring under this error?
“As of this morning, neither myself as Chairman or Councillor Cooper as the member concerned were aware that this change had been made on Friday. Not only does this amount to a discourtesy to myself as Chairman which I have explained above and grossly discourteous to Councillor Cooper, it has had the unfortunate effect of placing Council officers supporting the Committee in a most unenviable position.”

***

As well as tackling Councillor Spencer, Councillor Ashton took an equally hard line when he shared his concerns with the rest of the Tory group members …

***

He told them: “I feel a profound sense of disappointment that the harmony of the group which was arrived at in our meeting on Thursday after long and painstaking debate has been disturbed once again in this way; not least when Council officers are under the impression that this decision was taken by you all at the Group Meeting when it very clearly was not.
“It should come as a surprise to no one that this decision will likely effectively force Councillor Cooper to leave our group – in no small part because of the way in which he has been treated. This would be a monumental tragedy and loss of an effective and competent Conservative Ward Councillor and Planning Committee member.

***

“When I was coordinating the Borough Council election campaign last year, I made it very clear that our core objective was to see the then current team returned, in addition to gaining new members. Uniquely among Lincolnshire councils, we lost only one incumbent councillor and made a net gain in seats over 2015. With this in mind, I hope you will understand my distress at the continuation of this self-inflicted disharmony beyond the peace which we all assumed had been established last Thursday. Put simply, I have not spent hundreds of hours alongside other Party volunteers trying to elect and keep a Conservative majority on the Borough Council to have this actively undermined and good people forced out.

***

“We have an obligation to the voters who put us where we are to take decisions collectively which are driven by a desire to improve our borough.
“Personal feelings and spite must never come into this.”

***

Councillor Ashton’s comments were followed up by cabinet member Yvonne Stevens, who told Councillor Spencer …
“At the group meeting the main agenda item was to adopt rules for a Conservative Council Group, which we did, in detail.
“During the meeting and at no time did I enter into a discussion about councillors, removing or adding, to or from the Planning Committee. And neither did I hear the matter being discussed by anyone else.”

***

All of the above cut no ice with Councillor Spencer – whose exasperation shone like a beacon …

***

His response to group members was clearly impatient and intolerant of their concerns.

***

“I can not [sic] believe I have to address this again, [sic] in case it is not clear I will not have anyone on a committee who doesn’t support me and the vision I have for the town.
“I have given Councillor Cooper ample opportunity to carry on and serve however have been met with an abusive and obtuse behaviour every time. [sic]
“To those who don’t support me or even like me I would say park it and put the town above your personal vendettas out of respect for the people we are supposed to be serving as instead of engaging with this behaviour I will be working towards that and urge all of you to do the same.
“It was my decision and mine alone and I did it for what I thought was best for the town so we can move forward something I didn’t feel could be done under the current circumstances. It is a shame that Cllr Cooper has taken the decision to leave the party however as I already mentioned I have given him a lot of opportunities to work all of which were met with the same end.
“Once again I put the town first over and above personal issues.”

***

Councillor Cooper told Boston Eye that he only found out he had lost his planning role when a colleague texted to tell him.
“This was after I'd picked up my planning agenda,” he said. “Had he not let me know I would've turned up none the wiser.”

***

Asked for his thoughts on what prompted the move, he echoed Councillor Ashton …
“It’s all pure spite. Spencer did some back-stabbing and dirty dealing which was the reason I resigned as leader. I just didn’t want to be involved with it so I walked away from it.
“And then he wonders why I’m not all sweetness and light to him so out of spite he took me off of planning.
“He was a bit silly, because I’m probably one of the most experienced persons on planning. I’ve done five years on there, I was on the South East Lincolnshire Plan, I know a lot about planning law and the way it works, I’ve spoken at appeals for the council. I’ve done a fair bit around planning and how it works; I had the portfolio for it, so I’m pretty up to speed on it.

***

Asked what he thought had brought matters to a head, he said: “We had a group meeting and he didn’t like it because I asked awkward questions about things such as transport strategy – he’s not turned up to a single transport strategy meeting since he’s been leader.
“The other day he couldn’t be bothered to go to a leaders’ and chief executives’ meeting because he was too busy working at Boston West and couldn’t be bothered to go to Lincoln.
“He doesn’t go to meetings; he’s basically lazy. And he doesn’t do the job.”

***

The reference to the Boston West venue at Hubberts Bridge refers to a job which Councillor Spencer declared under The Relevant Authorities (Disposable Pecuniary Interests) Regulations of 2012.
According to the declaration he became General Manager not long after the hotel and golf complex was bought by former council colleague and prominent local property entrepreneur Alistair Arundell – who quit after five months in office.
Since then, Mr Arundell has announced big plans to develop Boston West which include a leisure complex, entertainment zone, aqua park, sauna and spa, and erecting more than 300 wooden luxury lodges on the 152-acre site. Although the plans have yet to come before the council for debate and approval, an application appeared last Friday on a list of received applications.

***

However, within a short space of time, an amendment saw Councillor Spencer’s declaration scored out – giving the impression that he no longer worked there. The amendment   the last of four updates made to the declaration  since 2017, was dated Thursday December 19th.
Despite that, a local news story dated 24th December announced that the plans for the centre were submitted to Boston Borough Council on Monday, December 23rd and included Councillor Spencer in a group photo identified as ‘the team’ at Boston West.
Perhaps you can see why people are confused.

***

When we asked Councillor Spencer if he could clarify this, he told us: “I worked at Boston West over Xmas it was always a temporary position and I took advice from the monitoring officer as to the most appropriate way of handling the DPI.
“The rumours that I still work there are however incorrect I do however socially visit as I do enjoy the odd 100 balls on the driving range and a game of golf.
“Thank you for getting in touch and giving me the opportunity to explain the situation.”

***

Somehow, we feel that the full consequences of this row have yet to be felt.
One thing that makes think this is a dark conclusion by Councillor Ashton in his comments to Councillor Spencer.
“Separately I believe there are also very serious questions raised by this episode which are relevant to the functioning of the Conservative Group which I will address through the appropriate channels and on a separate email.”

***

We conclude with a couple of definitions culled from the internet.

*** 
“A simple definition is that leadership is the art of motivating a group of people to act towards achieving a common goal. ... He or she is the person in the group that possesses the combination of personality and leadership skills that makes others want to follow his or her direction.”

***

“A dictatorship is a form of government where one person or political party has the power to do whatever they want. The ruler is called a dictator. In a dictatorship, the individuals rights are generally speaking, suppressed.”

***

We leave it to you to decide which one you are witnessing.

You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com
E– mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested.
Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com


We are on Twitter – visit @eye_boston