Friday, 16 October 2015


In last week’s issue we mentioned the desperate and monotonous regularity with which Boston Borough Council trots out the Stump and the twice-weekly market as the main attractions that draw people to the town.
But there are also a couple of newcomers.
The more important of the two is the signing of the Mayflower Compact … whose partners – mainly a bunch of councils – will work towards the 400th anniversary of the arrival of the Mayflower on the shores of America in 2020.
The original Mayflower Compact was signed at sea on 11th November 1620. It set out how the New World colony of Plymouth would be governed – and would later form part of the US constitution.
The wafflers tell us: “The Mayflower 400 vision and goals is a programme of events on a transformational scale that is being led by Plymouth UK and Plymouth Massachusetts, and is a platform for a national celebration of the remarkable relationship between the UK and US, which began with the sailing of the Mayflower in 1620. 
“It will once again place them, their heritage and its contribution to world history, on the global map.”
“The arrival of the Mayflower is celebrated by many in the US as “the beginning of a national legacy, and in the UK as the beginning of one of the most enduring alliances the world has ever known.”

***

In Boston, we make much of this – and the words Pilgrim and Mayflower litter the directory of local businesses and the like.
But the fact is that none of this has much to do with Boston.
Some careful economy with the  facts appears on Boston Guildhall’s webpage,which says: “So far as can be trusted from historic records there is no doubting that the Pilgrim Fathers sought to make their first escape bid overseas from the Lincolnshire coast, close to Boston in 1607, were betrayed, arrested and locked up in the Guildhall. Escape from religious persecution was their aim; their crime was seeking to leave the country without the permission of the King.
“It is this first recorded act of defiance, and the first recorded steps along the path which was to eventually take them to America to become an important part of the founding fathers, that forms such a close bond with Boston for Americans.”
That’s about the most you can say …
Although the website refers to them as the Pilgrim Fathers – they were then known as “Separatists” and their plan to escape England was with the end destination of Holland as their target.

***

Not only that, but Boston’s so-called Pilgrim Fathers  tried to  escape thirteen years before the real McCoy sailed from Plymouth.
And the people of the town that eventually settled across the Atlantic sailed to America between ten and 14 years afterwards – in 1630, 1633 and 1634 – supported as New World development assets by the Massachusetts Bay Company.
To make things even worse, these very first settlers from Plymouth, were initially referred to as the Old Comers and later as the Forefathers, and did not become known as the Pilgrim Fathers until two centuries after their arrival.

***

But, over time, Boston’s place as a footnote to the pages of history has been greatly aggrandized.
Our illustration at the top of the page shows how this was traded upon – with a heavily romanticised railway poster showing the PFs setting sail from the Guildhall gazing misty-eyed toward their destination.
At least two prominent historians have looked into any possible links between Boston and the Pilgrim Fathers.
In his 1856 immensely thorough History and Antiquities of Boston and the Hundred of Skirbeckundred of SkirbeckH, Pishey Thompson – who also spent time in the US Boston in the 1840’s, and so might have had greater reason than most to look for ties to the original settlers had this to say …


And 130 years later, local journalist George Bagley came to the same conclusion in his excellent book Boston – its story and people.

 


***

But venture across a couple of county borders, and our claim to have played a major role in all of this is put into perspective in not-too-distant Bassetlaw – where they have much to shout about.
The Nottinghamshire district council offers a Welcome to Pilgrim Country,  with a well-planned circular tour of key visitor points for those wanting to learn all about the Old Comers … errr …  Forefathers … err …Pilgrim Fathers.
You can find out more by visiting their site here 
Plans are well advanced to develop a currently disused barn at Scrooby – described as the spiritual home of the Pilgrim Fathers. 


 If you have taken a look at the Pilgrim County leaflet, you will note that Boston barely rates a mention.
Not only that but a footnote declares “The Mayflower Trail may be extended from Gainsborough, via the A156 to Lincoln (18 miles) and Boston (52 miles.)”

***

So what do we have? The mayor’s ‘X’ on a “compact” which will benefit most of the other signatories far more than it will Boston.
The place with most to gain will be Plymouth, doubtless followed by Bassetlaw and after that …
All the we have is a shaky connection between a group of people who were thwarted in their attempts to flee to Holland thirteen years before the Pilgrim Fathers (none of whom were Bostonians) set sail from Plymouth to the New World.
And what can we offer?
About the best we can muster is the Puritan Path” at Boston Stump – a memorial to 12 men and women who sailed from our Boston to found the other Boston in Massachusetts in 1630.
But that’s another – and completely different – story.
We suspect that the most likely impact of the Mayflower 2020 celebrations will be the excuse for a Worst Street civic party of some sort to enjoy a freebie in America – which won’t do the rest of us the slightest bit of good.

***

None of this seems to deter Boston Borough Council’s plan to change the way we celebrate Christmas with the introduction of Illuminate – a planned annual ceremony on US Thanksgiving Day which will be used to to mark the anniversary of the Mayflower landing in four years’ time.
Perhaps the reason for this is because Worst Street can get the luvvies at Transported to build a model Mayflower for them – this year at least.
They might then hope that moving the celebratory goalposts will persuade businesses to stump up money to fund this on-going novelty for another four years – which would take matters beyond the next elections and therefore make them someone else’s problem.
The Thanksgiving holiday tradition seems most likely traced back to a “poorly documented” celebration held in 1621 at Plymouth, Massachusetts when the Old Comers … errr …  Forefathers … err …Pilgrim Fathers and Wampanoag Indians had a harvest feast.
We’ve looked at this from all directions, but still can’t see why we will no longer make Christmas the main focus of our commemorations at this time of year and instead mark American Thanksgiving Day – especially as the evidence of a Boston connection is so flimsy.

***

All this moves us seamlessly to Boston’s other big cunning plan – membership of Die Hansa – a form of resurrection of the Hanseatic League of which Boston was a member along with around 200 other medieval ports and cities in medieval times.
Unlike other former league members, Boston has absolutely nothing to show that it was once a member – other than an artist’s impression of the “steelyard” where goods were once weighed and stamped.
History tells us that Boston’s part in all of this was less than glorious.
There were problems with wool being smuggled  locally without duty, the decline of the salt exporting trade, and then, in about 1470, a foreign trader was murdered by Boston merchant Humphrey Littleburye – which led to the ending of the Hansa link when the Esterling family quit the town.
And we’re celebrating this …?

***

Daft as all the above mentioned stuff is, we don’t expect anything by way of public reaction.
But what does set local opinion alight is … toilets – especially when they are under threat.
And that now looks to be the case in Boston.
A report to this week‘s Environment and Performance Committee reviews the operation of the five public toilets still run by Worst Street at the inordinately  high cost of £200,000 a year, with income from the three which charge expected to be around £21,400.
Ominously, beneath the heading Future Provision the report notes: “There are a number of local authorities across the country who have made the decision that, as a Discretionary Service, they will cease to provide public toilet facilities and have looked at private provision i.e. working with partners in the commercial sector to enable them to open their facilities to the general public, whether they be retail outlets or public houses, or hotels, for example.
“As part of the Task and Finish Group looking at the town centre, this option may well be discussed as a potential solution for the borough council to consider, as there is no doubt that, even with an income stream arising from charging, the costs of provision will always be considerable.”
We think that this can safely be taken to mean that Worst Street will ask local businesses to throw their toilet doors open wide to all comers whilst the council pockets the money it had previously spent and brags of yet another partnership.
Of course, most shops, pubs or hotels don’t currently charge customers to use their facilities.
And if the Worst Street idea were to be adopted, they would presumably absorb a large amount of the £200,000 bill.
But worse might be on the cards for them
A year ago, Boston’s Goody Two Shoes News (circulation 783) presented readers with an album of nauseating photographs in a so-called attempt to explain away complaints by council-run toilet users …
Beneath the heading DEFILED – DEPRAVED Would you clean it up?  GTSN told readers: “Images connected with this article come with a warning: They show graphic scenes of the disgusting condition some have left Boston’s public toilets in. If you do not have a strong stomach then do not look at them.
“They are used to demonstrate that, despite the best efforts of council staff, some people persist in leaving visitors with the wrong impression; that public toilets in Boston are neglected and not maintained.”
Might this explain Worst Street’s enthusiasm for the possibility of dumping the problem on someone else? No pun intended.

***

GTSN’s policy of ramping up any possible detrimental news for Boston had a field day this week supporting Hate Crime Week.
Another sizzling headline read:  Help stop Hate Crime before it ends in murder and went on: “This was brought home to Boston when Sophie Lancaster’s mother, Sylvia, came to the town as a guest of Boston Borough Council to speak about the tragic way in which her daughter had become a victim of hate crime.”
Sophie was attacked and subsequently died because she wore Goth style clothing.
The incident happened in Bacup in Lancashire in 2007, and Sophie’s mother was invited to Boston to talk about it in 2011 as part of a previous awareness week.
Overall the impression given by Worst Street’s coverage of this suggests a serious problem in Boston.
But – whilst local figures aren’t available – the total of hate crimes in Lincolnshire in 2014-2015 was 243 … or 0.03% of the population
This doesn’t mean that it is not important – but it ought to be seen in perspective, and not over-promoted in a way that bangs yet another nail in Boston’s coffin by making it sound a bad and dangerous place to live when it isn’t.
Incidentally, Lincolnshire Police statistics tell us that since January 2008, the number of hate crimes directed at members of the punk and Goth community has totalled precisely – NIL.

***

Mention of GTSN reminds us … a reader who queried the cost of the production of the council’s daily bulletin received the precise – but we think implausible – answer that it worked out at £11.06 a day … an annual cost of £2,867.60.
Either these figures have been calculated in a way to avoid criticism or the two people who produce it must be among the lowliest-paid in Worst Street.

***

We have been critical throughout the long winded process of naming local “heroes” whose unsung generosity and service to the community has been recognised by a cack-handed “salute” on the borough’s dustbin lorries.
Worse still, now that the giant posters are on display, a sinister picture has emerged of “faceless” people.
Take this one for instance…


Tea is being served – for some strange reason in the middle of a field that is energetically being harvested – by a featureless waitress to an equally blank-faced clutch of customers.
However, it’s not all eerie …
In another illustration – depicting Boston’s fishing fleet – again, whilst without expression, there is a hint of humour in that one of the sailors appears to be dancing a hornpipe …
Or so it seems.

***

Don’t forget that this coming Monday 19th October is your first chance to publicly question members of the Worst Street Cabinet of Curiosities at a special session starting at 6pm.
It’s dead easy – all you have to do is initially submit the question in writing, and then be prepared to attend the session in person to ask your question and receive the answer.
Your questions must be relevant to the council’s duties and responsibilities or issues that affect the borough, and the sessions are exclusively for members of the public resident in Boston borough.
Rumours that a family pet had to be surrendered as a hostage appear to be unfounded.

***

In our earlier piece about public toilet provision for Boston, we noted mention of Worst Street’s latest Task and Finish committee – this time to “look” at the town centre.
Sadly,  Boston Borough Council devotes an unhealthy amount of time to navel-gazing whilst neighbouring districts cut to the chase … they come up with an idea, develop it and then put it into action.
Last Friday, for instance, saw the annual Spalding Pumpkin Parade, which has been running for several years, and which is sponsored by a local grower who claims to be the largest pumpkin producer in Europe.
It provides entertainment throughout the day and draws visitors from a wide area.
And last week also saw the first Made in Sleaford exhibition taking place over two days across three Sleaford venues.
Richard Noble – who held the land speed record between 1983 and 1997 – was a guest speaker.
The Bloodhound car he is behind is designed to achieve 1,000 mph – and is sponsored by Sleaford-based SHD Composites.
Councillor Marion Brighton, leader of North Kesteven District Council, said: “It is not only the nose cone of the Bloodhound supersonic car which carries the name and reputation of Sleaford around the world, but many other world-class products which we are proud to say come from this town ...
… “I defy anyone not to discover something new in the wealth of Sleaford's extensive productivity, from flour to films, pianos to ploughs, violins, vegetables, and even an engine featured in a Bond film."
Made in Sleaford was staged last  Friday and Saturday between 10am and 5pm and included a free family-friendly fun day with entertainment, music, an aerial dance rig and food producers’ display.
And what was Worst Street doing last weekend?
No doubt thinking about taking a look at how to make something of the town centre.
It’s not even a start.

***

Traffic wardens seem to be more in evidence in Boston these days – although they are often spotted in the out of town areas where the job is more like shooting fish in a barrel than preventing problems cause by illegal parking.
Recent figures from Lincolnshire County Council tell us that so far this year Boston’s Market Place is where you are most likely to receive a fine, with Sheep Market in Spalding second and Wide Bargate in Boston third.


Silver Street and Portland Street in Lincoln complete the top five locations.
The enforcers’ diligence in Boston has helped Lincolnshire County Council make a £50,730 surplus on £1,110,277 in fines from 35,517 tickets as part of its professed determination to reduce inconsiderate parking and congestion across Lincolnshire.
Our roving cameraman recently caught this candid picture (above) of a warden at work in Boston …

***

Whilst Boston Borough Council is getting its knickers in a twist about Hate Crime, far more serious is the day-to-day way of life in the town which Worst Street chooses to overlook.
Lincolnshire Police imposed a dispersal order in Boston Town Centre last weekend between 9pm on Friday and 6am on Sunday, covering roughly the same area as the current Public Space Protection Order – pronounced Spo.
The cops said this was part of general procedure, and was looking to relaunch its OpNova campaign – an acronym for No to Violence and Abuse.
So … what is a dispersal order?
The Anti-Social Behaviour Act 2003 gives the police powers in designated areas to disperse groups of two or more where their presence or behaviour has resulted, or is likely to result, in a member of the public being harassed, intimidated, alarmed or distressed.
Lincolnshire Police say that the idea of OpNova  is to reduce alcohol related anti-social behaviour and reduce the violence in the night time economy.
It also seems to suggest that the PSPO is not working – hence the need for the dispersal order.
Sorting this out seems to be a more important target than the one currently being rolled out by Worst Street through the GTSN.
But because it might be more controversial and harder to achieve might be why it is being side-lined.

***

Time and again, we hear mention of the imminent arrival of a new Lidl store in Tawney Street.
But as the months have gone by, the rumours that it might not happen have been mounting …
We thought that the best way to get to the bottom of all this would be to go to the pferdemaul  – the horse’s mouth.
So we sent emails to Lidl asking about their plans for Boston … not once … not twice … but three times.
But antwort kam dort keine – or to put it another way … answer came there none.

***

Finally, the BBC if no one else seems to have fallen in love with the idea that an “Illuminate” festival should replace recognition of Christmas in Boston.
However, they so beefed it up in a Tweet to readers that we felt obliged to add a comment.


You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com  Your e-mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested.
Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com  


Friday, 9 October 2015



Fallout from last week’s fractious full council meeting  – which sounds as though it more closely resembled  a classroom from which teacher has been called away  that rapidly descends into  the kindergarten  atmosphere that we all remember from our childhood than a meeting of minds dedicated to the service of the people of Boston through mature governance and civilised debate.
This week sees the announcement of the RESIGNATION of the UKIP group leader and party veteran Sue Ransome … CLARIFICATION  of Labour’s position within the uneasy set up at Worst Street … and a further BITE BACK by UKIP’s current  deputy leader.
  
***

Councillor Ransome’s statement was short and to the point:
“I have stood down as Leader of the UKIP Group, due to a 'leadership style disagreement'.
“I will still be a UKIP Lincolnshire County Councillor, a Boston Borough and also Kirton Parish Councillor.  I will still work hard for the people who have elected me and continue to fly the flag for UKIP as I have for the last fifteen years.
“Anyone, in the County Division of Boston East, Station Ward of Boston Borough or the Parish of Kirton can contact me with any concerns and I will endeavour to assist them.”

***

Sadly her decision echoes earlier problems encountered by UKIP after elections in 2013 for the county and the borough, which saw the party fragment and individual members change their political names.
The result was that nothing other than acrimony was achieved to the disbenefit of the councils concerned, and their electors.
It seems to us that the best way forward for UKIP now is to determine what its members want to achieve for the people of Boston and to set that as their sole target and forget about internal wrangling.
But, somehow, we don’t think that this will happen.

*** 

Last week’s criticism by UKIP Deputy Leader Councillor Paul Noble prompted a lengthy response from Councillor Paul Gleeson – Labour’s group leader … 

***
Clarification continued when Councillor Noble told us that car parking revenue figures he quoted  at last week’s full council meeting were correct – despite accusations by Finance supremo Aaron, Councillor Spencer, and “indirectly” by Conservative running dog Councillor Alison Austin, of supplying or quoting inaccurate information on this issue to back up his arguments.
Quite why these people feel that they are so clever and that everyone else – especially newly arrived UKIP councillors – are either idiots or liars defeats any kind of logic.
Sadly the smug Spencer/Austin duet overlook the fact that once upon a time they were new to local politics – but now regard length of service as conferring some sort of right to be offensive in a way which normal, reasonable, polite and civil people would not –  and which, sadly, they believe constitutes ‘politics.’
We call it the “I’m a councillor …” syndrome – uttered in a voice which implies that this makes an individual someone special, rather than merely being someone who has offered themselves for public service.

***

A similar – and surprisingly smug response – came when talk turned to UKIP’s proposals about traffic problems at the Monday meeting, from a newly elected and still wet behind the ears Labour councillor.
Nigel Welton – who despite his inexperience is vice-chairman of the environment and performance committee – declared that a task group had already been set up to look at parking in Boston.
This, apparently, was enough for him to claim that Councillor Noble was merely seeking a sound bite in the Boston sub-Standard.
And if this was  not enough to underline his naivety, he reportedly blustered on … “If Councillor Noble has no confidence in procedures that this council has in place, maybe he has no right being here.”
Smug idiot alert …
Councillor Noble’s right to be in the council chamber is precisely the same as that of Councillor Welton – in that both men stood for election and were successful.
The difference between the two in terms of status, is that Councillor Welton is the fortunate beneficiary of an arrangement between the Labour and the Tory groups … and as the only other Labour card  in the Worst Street pack of jokers now has a status that might not have come his way otherwise.

***

Google Street view

The other interesting piece of fallout came in an intervention from the normally well-informed and erudite council ‘leader’ Pete ‘Nipper’ Bedford.
When Councillor Noble suggested that a house on Sleaford Road which prohibits the smooth passage of traffic using Sleaford Road – and the access to ASDA and a couple of doctors’ surgeries – could be demolished, ‘Nipper’ was quick to intervene to declare that the house in question was Grade I listed and “must stay.”
Wrong!
The house in question – number 5 Sleaford Road – was listed on 13th March 1996 during the seemingly endless debate over the building of  the (then) new ASDA store.
At times it almost looked as though the whole project would stall, as the council kept asking for minor tweaks, and we became embroiled in a debate about rearranging things in order to save a cherished monkey puzzle tree from being felled.
The house that now stands so inconveniently in the way of traffic using Sleaford Road was one of a number of similar buildings.
Ridiculously, they were believed to be so important that although some would have reluctantly to be demolished, just one should remain as a “specimen” to show what had been sacrificed  – which was then listed … Grade II and not Grade I.
As far as the leader’s edict that this means the house “must stay,” there ought to be room for manoeuvre in the name of common sense.
There are specific criteria for listing buildings.
Briefly,  these cover architectural interest, historic interest, historic association, and group value ... which applies to buildings that form part of an "architectural ensemble."
Number 5 Sleaford Road was built around 1830, and  whilst the criteria say that most buildings built between 1700 and 1840 are listed, after 1840 more selection is exercised –  with only buildings of “definite quality and character” designed to include the major works of principal architects likely to qualify ... so the place could fairly be said to be borderline.
None of the main criteria apply to the house.
"Architectural interest" relates to buildings of importance because of their design, decoration and craftsmanship. 
That’s a clear no-no.
"Buildings of historic interest" illustrate an aspect of the nation's social, economic, cultural or military history.
Nope.
And "historic association" refers to buildings that demonstrate close historical association with nationally important people or events.
Three strikes ... and you’re out.
Like us, by now you might be wondering why this building was ever listed to begin with – and we suspect that the dead hand of Worst Street was meddling in there somewhere.
But all is not lost.
At the time of listing the interior of the building was not inspected, and its subsequent uses have rendered it increasingly unattractive.
It is not impossible to apply for listed building consent to remove such an eyesore, and we see little reason why this could not be done.
Government guidelines say that demolition of historic buildings is seldom necessary “for reasons of good planning” – which certainly do not apply here –  but more often is a result of neglect or the failure to make imaginative efforts to find new uses for them or to incorporate them into a new development … which fits the bill perfectly.
Just think how much more easily traffic would flow in and out of Boston with a roundabout where this ugly bottleneck now causes such huge problems.

***
 


It looks as though Boston is losing out at the hands of Lincolnshire County Council yet again.
Regular readers will recall that as part of the Boston Barrier scheme, Clownty Hall set aside £11 million towards keeping water at consistent levels between Grand Sluice and Black Sluice Pumping Station.
There were said to be considerable economic benefits attached to this, as it would attract more waterborne visitors and also make possible Boston’s entry into the ambitious Fens Waterways Link, which would create a major new network of non-tidal waterways between Lincoln, Boston, Peterborough, Cambridge and Ely.
However, as money got tighter, Head Office decided earlier this year to adopt a “phased approach” – which means the postponement of the water management scheme that would have kept levels constant.
The official line is that this means some benefits will be felt sooner, and the barrier will open on time.
“The initial steps we are looking at include creating new or improving existing facilities to increase access to the Haven and the availability of moorings in and around Boston,” said a spokesman.
Whatever benefits may accrue, it now seems most unlikely that Boston will ever see the big plan come to fruition.
Whilst the county’s excuse sounds plausible, it also rings somewhat hollow given the news that Lincolnshire County Council has been working for years on a £900,000 scheme to create 110 metres of new commercial moorings and 60 metres of leisure moorings along the west bank of the River Nene – and has now submitted plans to South Holland District Council.
This time, the official line is that: “Sutton Bridge is something of a forgotten gateway into Lincolnshire.
“Through the development of the marina we aim to reverse this by creating an arrival point for boaters and an interesting attraction for those passing on the A17.
“We hope the development will provide a significant boost to the local economy, something that will benefit businesses and residents alike.”
Hmmm.

***

Whilst the news that councils in England will be able to keep the proceeds of their business rates is excellent, you can never be sure what it might mean in Boston.
We worry that here, any windfall will soon vanish into vanity projects such as the Moulder Leisure Centre and the PRSA – or may even see the creation of new ones.
Interestingly, the plans will give councils the scope to charge less than at present,  which is predicted to see authorities “competing” for business by offering lower rates than their neighbours.
Given Boston’s track record, we fear that things will only get worse.

***

After last week’s mention of the Assembly Rooms and the flying of flags, we are told that information on the days that flags are flown appear on the club’s website ... such as http://www.assembly-rooms.co.uk/dukeofcambridge/   and that the next one in the diary will of course be Remembrance Day!

***

Town Centre portfolio holder Councillor Paul Skinner has continued his policy of asking others to do his job for him with an appeal in the Boston Sub-Standard to talk Boston UP not DOWN.
This is all well and good – but we have to say that talk is not enough, and that action is necessary.
Councillor Skinner falls back on a list of attractions which the town has dined out on for decades – Boston Stump, and the twice weekly market … rather like an old soldier endlessly retelling his part in some ancient battle.
To this he adds membership of Die Hansa, which we fear will do little for the town other than provide some interesting jollies for its councillors, and the signing of the Mayflower Compact, which will see councils work together in the run-up to the 400th anniversary of the departure of the Pilgrim Fathers from Plymouth – an episode of historic drama in which Boston’s role is as an ingénue rather than a star performer.
We think that one of the biggest problems highlighted by Councillor Skinner’s list of things that have been done is the way that the council loots other peoples’ bank accounts.
So far it has managed to grab £67,000 of the £1 million Boston Big Local’s funding in just two years.
And for what?
 … To fund Boston in Bloom for instance – although quite how our meagre displays compared with others earned a gold award is anyone’s guess. Check out the pictures like the one on the left (not Boston!) on the internet if you doubt our words.
 … To fund a vacuum cleaner to suck up discarded cigarette ends – and now to supply pocket ashtrays.
A nanny council move,  if ever we heard of one 
For things like these, Boston Borough Council receives money to pay for  jobs which are its responsibility in the first place – funded by an organisation whose ground rules specifically prohibit such payments.
Then there is Transported  – the group name for a bunch of luvvies which enters its third and final year in a race to blow the last few quid of a £2½ million grant from the Arts Council “to increase the number of people engaging in and enjoying high quality arts experiences in Boston and South Holland.”
And if it’s money, then Boston Borough Council will be first in the queue with a wheelbarrow.
This is why we have posters and banners here, there, and everywhere – stuck on anything that stays still long enough to have something slapped on it.
The faces of “Local Heroes” will adorn our dustcarts – an unusual way of recognising the achievements of  local volunteers.
More banners will ornament the route into the town from the railway station through a “revamped” B&M  open space – for which read car park.
Only Boston Borough Council would consider that spending £3,500 to create a sand pit for two days as an attraction was money well spent – although, of course, it’s not their money.

***

Other things on Councillor Skinner’s list of triumphs (which are nothing to do with Worst Street) include a “Network Development Officer” for Boston to “further develop” business opportunities, and who has revived “the Town Team” –  whose activities are shrouded in silence. 
He also cites grant schemes to improve the look of the town centre – which have been available for years but not taken up – and “events in the Market Place” which appear to comprise the dwindling (and never publicised)  craft market.
When the Market Place was first “refurbished,” Worst Street promised a wide variety of events and entertainments – none of which have materialised.
To cap it all, Councillor Skinner declared: “I’d rather pose the question, ask not what Boston can do for you, but what can you do for Boston? We can all help by looking for the positives and talking the town up – our reputation and our perceived attractiveness depends upon it.”
If his phraseology seems familiar, then it is.

It may surprise some readers to learn that he is not exactly being original.
It is a crassly butchered version of one of the most famous quotations in  recent history – the opening words of John Kennedy’s inaugural address as the 35th President of the United States on Friday, January 20th  1961  following his election as the youngest ever American President.
Do we detect delusions of grandeur in Councillor Skinner, perhaps?

***

However, one thing that did amuse us in Councillor Skinner’s rant was an item of new play equipment in Central Park about which he chose to boast … 
You may need to read it a time or two, but we think that “rock and bowl duel axis roundabout"  needs amending to dual to remove the implied undertones of violence. Unless, of course, one user puts a bowl on his head whilst another hits it with a rock!


***

Finally from the world of words, a heading from a Boston Borough Council e-mail caught our eye.


Whilst in the previous administration the identity of the old bags in question might not have been too challenging to guess, we find it a little harder to identify who might be the subjects referred to this time around.
Although at least one name does spring to mind … 




You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com  Your e-mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested.
Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com  






Friday, 2 October 2015



According to its most recent report listing the headlines for the “risks” facing Boston Borough Council, the future – unlike the slogan – is RED.
Time and again we have questioned Worst Street’s ability to continue to function as one of the smallest councils in the country which spends most of its income on remaining in existence.
Now, what looks like the end of the road is being approached at great speed.
Some of the most crucial raisons d'être for the council’s existence are now heavily under threat –  so much so that some might say there is a strong possibility that they will not succeed.
Most important is the pledge to deliver better council services with less money.
This is now categorised as being almost certain not to happen, with an impact classified as “critical” with 75% likelihood.
The risk here is in the long term balancing of the budget, economic and funding uncertainty, with controls in place in the form of a medium term financial strategy; the budgetary process; and a sound level of reserves. 
“Continued close monitoring” is promised and there is also mention of the mysterious “transformation programme” which as far as we can tell has so far cost more than it has saved.
It’s also worth remembering that reserves are finite –  something which often seems to escape our leaders as they continue to plunder the borough's remaining cash to fund the Moulder/PRSA vanity project to the tune of hundreds of thousands of pounds. 
These risk reports appear quarterly, never seem to improve, and are apparently noted in the appropriate committees with scarcely a yawn.

***

There is also an “exceptional” report this time about the availability – or rather non-availability – of disabled facilities grants.
These grants aim to make life easier for people with mobility problems and include such things as ramps, showers for those who can no longer use a bath, stair-lifts and widening of doorways for wheelchair access.
BUT ... there is no agreed budget for DFGs in 2016/17 as funding was included in the Better Care Fund paid to Lincolnshire County Council directly from April 2015 and the amount for 2015/16 ‘passported’ to Worst Street, has only covered referrals and commited cash up to November last year.
The risk report, which awards the DFG problem a maximum rating of 16, says that “in the absence of any agreed finance for 16/17, it is therefore not possible to plan for resources committed in 15/16 to actually be paid from an agreed 16/17 budget which is how the DFG programme has been managed in previous years.”
How disabled people might cope is not discussed.

***

Question marks also remain over lack of growth, the stagnant local economy, and the future of the town centre in terms of retail,housing and car parking  –  although the proposed Task and Finish group  is being tipped to ride to the rescue of the latter item.
We’re not selling any tickets to the celebration party for solving that particular mess.

***

Monday’s full council meeting saw Boston's UKIPpers flexing their political muscle for the first time with a series of motions designed to rattle the cage of the council’s so-called “leadership” and their non-Tory toadies.
And what a dreary agenda it might otherwise have been –  with just two items up for discussion ... the Deregulation Act 2015 – changes to hackney carriage and private hire licensing legislation; and Boston borough council's surveillance policy and procedures. 
Agendas such as this are what you get when you work under the cabinet system  –  a defanged council where individual members have no say whatever and simply sit and watch while the leadership and so-called independent and opposition parties connive to defeat democracy.
All six motions were proposed by Councillor Jonathan Noble, Deputy Leader of the UKIP group, and seconded by Councillor Stephen Ball.
From a public point of view, the two most interesting items concerned roads and parking.
One was a call for an advisory cross-party committee to look at Boston’s congestion spots and suggest changes which would improve traffic flow.
The group also proposed free parking in Boston’s Market Place for a 30-minute period to encourage more people to shop in the town centre.
Another proposal called for officers to work with Hanseatic Developments –  whose plans for White Horse Wharf were recently thrown out  –  to consider how best to maintain their warehouse.
The rest were demands for the main opposition group in Worst Street – if it has a substantial numerical advantage over other opposition groups – to chair the Overview and Scrutiny Committee’s Environment and Performance and Corporate and Community committees, along with the Audit and Governance Committee.
Added to this was the vice-chairmanship of the Planning and Licensing/Regulatory and Appeals committees.

***

In any other council these chairmanship requests would not have seemed unreasonable, but the Tories, Labour and two so-called independents are apparently so filled with hatred for UKIP that in some cases they are willing to surrender their political integrity to make life impossible for the party.
This means that 17 of Boston’s 30 councillors who claim to represent the people care more for “their” people than they do for the wishes of the remainder of the electorate.
Let’s not forget that the political make-up of Boston Borough Council is Conservative - 13, UKIP - 12, Independent - 2, Labour - 2,and “Unaligned”- 1.
It’s worth remembering that the so-called “unaligned” councillor is in fact a UKIP defector who now regards himself as Independent.
But whoever drew up the lists at Worst Street apparently considers him not fit to be an “Independents Independent” and share the title with the other two councillors thus named.
Therefore – in the clear interests of unfairness – we have committees chaired by a Labour Councillor (one of only two) and an Independent (one of only two) whilst the recent election of a UKIP chairman of B-Tacky remains ignored in the council listings.

***

It goes without saying that there are no members of the cabinet other than Tories – but it wasn’t always like that.
UKIP Councillor Brian Rush recalls a time when – despite the apparent antipathy between the Boston Bypass Independents and Tories – the BBI offered a deal to none other than the current Conservative “leader” Pete ‘Nipper’ Bedford.
Councillor Rush told Boston Eye: “There we all were, just before going into yet another, one sided, non-productive, council meeting ... 
All we rejects were lolling about uninspired, in the opposition members’ meeting room, when in trundles the normally sedate Councillor Bedford, who gleefully announces to us that Richard Austin had been to see him (PB) and had offered him (PB) a seat on the BBI Cabinet....!
“Whaaaat! Of course, there were gasps of amazement...mumblings and grumblings, some of delight, but most of dismay!
“’When?’  and ‘What are you going to do,’ someone asked, ‘You're not taking it..! Are you?’  another cried. In truth the mood was somewhat stunned.
“‘No!’ said Peter measuredly, ‘I am not.... I have already refused it, but tonight I am going to stand up, in council, and ask Councillor Austin to confirm in public that he did make the offer!`
“Woweee!
“Now we really were excited, it was going to be a great night for us rejects after all.
“Council began; there was hushed anticipation, the excitement mounted, all of us wallowing in what was going to be a major embarrassment, for that cocky Richard Austin ...
“Hush... Silence, all eyes on Peter ...  a hero was about to be born ... anytime now ... come on Pete, come on ...
“Nothing, absolutely nothing.....!
“I really cannot remember if anyone spoke to Councillor Bedford after that meeting.
“I think a bunch of us just trudged down to the Eagle Pub, moaned and sank a couple of pints......then got a cab home.
“Does this explain why some of us no longer support, nor have trust in anything Peter does, or pretends that he will do?
“Maybe this could also have been why some past, but (yes, truly there were one or two) half decent Bypassers decided not to bother standing again for Councillor Austin’s group ... maybe there is little to choose between the standards of either man.
“But I wonder, if given the right question, in the right forum, which one of them would tell us the truth.
“People tell me that Richard Austin is a good, regular and dedicated churchgoing man. Maybe we should just ask him for his recall.
“Thing is, I do still have a number of people, who do remember what it was that Peter had advocated, I wonder if our Mayor will confirm or deny it.”

***

After Monday’s meeting, a frustrated Councillor Noble told Boston Eye: “All six UKIP motions at the full council meeting were defeated by the combined votes of Conservative, Labour and Independent councillors. 
"The Conservatives chose to adopt a patronising, condescending attitude towards the UKIP group and seemed to display a remarkable degree of complacency with regard to Boston's continuing traffic problems in dismissing UKIP's suggestion of the setting up of an advisory cross-party committee which would have examined congestion spots in Boston's road traffic network and suggested specific changes to Lincolnshire County Council's Highways Department which would improve traffic flow.
“The UKIP group is not convinced that the Labour group – two councillors – is in fact acting in opposition to the Conservative ruling group as in every full council vote since May 7th they have voted with the Conservatives on every motion that has been debated.
“This is one reason why the UKIP group has attempted to gain the chairmanships of the two Scrutiny Committees because, as the Council's Scrutiny and Policy Development Protocol states: ‘Where a majority group (or coalition) controls the Council, the Chairman of the Overview and Scrutiny Committee should be from an opposition group."
“The Conservatives and their allies also chose to reject UKIP's proposal of free parking for thirty minutes in the Market Place as a means of encouraging more citizens to shop in the town centre.
“Revenue from this car park in the last financial year was £86,530.
“Not all this revenue would be lost and could be counterbalanced by the projected £85,241 increase in council tax revenue in the present financial year. 
“As this proposal was being discussed, I drew attention to some of the lavish funding the council had provided in other areas: the Health and Wellbeing capital spend which is currently £1,693,000 as set out in the Quarter 1 performance report and considered by Cabinet on 9th September 2015; the £8,956,000 spent by the council to date on the PRSA; the £293,000 increase in the estimated PRSA
and GMLC biomass boiler costs –  £456,000 to £749,000; and the £840,000 that the council has invested in the PRSA for improvement works, as agreed by the full council on 2nd  March 2015.
“The UKIP group will continue to hold the Conservative ruling group and its executive to account through its scrutiny work on the various council committees.”

***

Sadly, we cannot see such efforts will achieve anything much given the inappropriate mind-set not only of the Tory group but its Labour and Independent lackeys. The Labour group attitude surprises and disappoints us in equal measure –  especially given its leader's adulation of a Corbyn leadership which seeks to wind back the clock and return power and fairness to the people.
Incongruity tinged with hypocrisy best sums it up – and we think that a quotation from George Orwell’s Animal Farm ... which must be high on any Labour Party reading list ... says all that needs saying. 
It runs thus: “All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others.”
In this case, for “some animals” read “ Boston Labour animals” and for “others” read “ Boston UKIP animals.”

***

Whine lovers will doubtless be ecstatic at the return of “Peter’s Notes” to the pages of the local free magazine Simply Boston. 
After a brief absence, 'Nipper’s' column – which “discusses the important topics in and around Boston”  is back in the September issue.
But if the items under discussion have a familiar ring to them – it’s because they are not new.
For once, “Nipper” isn’t fobbing people off with some stale old column what he wrote earlier.
But so desperate is he to claim that Boston is advancing in leaps and bounds that he has resorted to trawling through all the old stuff camouflaged by just one new development.
The newcomer is Pep&Co,  the UK  arm of  South African-based Pepkor, an investment firm set up by former Asda chief executive Andy Bond – which has as its slogan “spend a little ... get a lot.”
In Boston, we know full well what this means – another buy-it-cheap-stack-it-high outlet of the kind which abound in the town.
It is a sad reflection on Boston that the only newcomers which consider opening here are of similar ilk – cut price, and often low quality outlets.
However, the arrival of yet another cheap clothes shop was enough for “Nipper” to recall that a local butcher has opened a second shop along with B&M – who have sensibly chosen a site where parking is free.
He also mentions a new store from Jewellers Maud’s (sic) which is in fact a relocation, the “expansion” of Wilcox and Carter’s jewellery shop, which is actually a refit and expansion within the same small shop it has occupied for more than 50 years, and plans by Lildl (sic) to open a Boston store –  which seem to have gone very quiet.
But – lest we become so overwhelmed that we need a sniff of sal volatile – the leader is happy to remind us of other successes of a gloomier kind which received “much interest” at the “recent” Local Government Association national conference – in June.
Yes, yet again, Boston is dining out on the flood disaster of December 2013 and the council’s robust approach on rogue landlords.
The leader ends by telling us: “Finally, after the election, the council has settled down to another period of activity and I am pleased to have at my side (Ed: shouldn't this say " beneath my heel?”) a cabinet of experienced and enthusiastic councillors who are passionate about the town and have their sleeves rolled up ready for hard work ahead.”
Although it would be impolite to laugh, we have to say ... ha-ha-ha!

***

Varying responses arrived after mention of the Assembly Rooms in the last issue of Boston Eye.
One reader – an official of the Boston to Skegness Seabank Marathon – told us “for the last three years they have let us use the nightclub free of charge for registration for the marathon.
“It must be a real pain for them; their staff will have had little or no sleep as they are open for business until just a few hours before we start registration at 7am on the Sunday morning.
“It was really easy to organise, I just said to Matt Clark ‘is there any chance I can borrow your nightclub for the registration for the marathon?’ and he said ‘yes.’
They can’t do enough to help.
“Maybe if more people asked, there would be more community usage.”

***

But another reader asked: “Why can't the owners of the Assembly Rooms make sure that the clock is right – it is the only one seen by all in Market Place?
“Also why can't they fly flags on appropriate days? After all they make a lot of money from Boston folk, and it would be good to give a little back to the town centre and help make it a tad more attractive!
“My pet hate is the Market Place. 
“Why can we not have some "legal" road markings so that everyone knows where the road is, and then pedestrians will not hold group chats in the middle of the road. 
“The council keep faffing around wasting money by constantly changing their ideas for it, but all it does is drive people away from the town centre.
“It is a right mess ... as are the buses travelling through a pedestrian area!”

***

Hard on the heels of the news that the PRSA has been “saved” by the ridiculous actions of Boston Borough Council throwing good money after band in acts of increasing desperation, comes a small cloud on the horizon..
Regular readers will recall that the company which has ridden to the rescue – 1life – was formerly known as Leisure Connection,
A long time ago Worst Street tried for a deal with LC to take on the PRSA but it foundered after a lengthy period of discussion.
At the time, Leisure Connection – which ran other council sports facilities around Lincolnshire and the rest of the country – had an extremely bad reputation ... and even a critical website dedicated to its shortcomings.
Now with a new name, we would hope that things are better again.
But a report from Spalding, where the company runs the Castle Sports Complex, recently called for a debate on the facility's future after changing rooms were described as “disgusting,” and the pool water temperature was referred to as cold.
Admittedly, the centre is 31 years old, but the PRSA is already thirteen and part of the deal requires almost £100,000 spending on repairs.
It would be nice to celebrate the disappearance of the PRSA from its treasured place on Boston Borough Council financial mantelpiece – but we have the feeling that this story is far from over.

***

We are pleased to see that our council “leader” has acted on our reminder of a couple of months ago and announced the start of the cabinet “Question Times” promised in his party manifesto back in May.
Well, not quite the start – rather the trumpeting of the first meeting of its kind that will be held “at intervals – possibly quarterly – as part of our policy of demonstrating openness, transparency and access.”
As might be expected, the procedure is not an easy one. 
Whilst the cabinet’s next meeting is on Wednesday 21st October at 10am, the Q&A will be at 6pm, three days earlier on Monday 19th.
And there are a few blazing hoops to be jumped through as well.
“Those wishing to ask a question are asked to firstly submit them in writing, and then be prepared to attend the session in person to ask their question and receive the answer,” says the borough’s announcement.
The excuse for this is so that portfolio holders “can present the most comprehensive answers, by having all pertinent information available” – but it will more likely have the desired effect of putting people off, so that the powers that be can declare the arrangement a failure and do
away with it as quickly as possible.
It’s likely that very few council taxpayers know that they already have the “right” that is now being granted to them.
It’s almost a year since Boston Borough Council introduced a 20 minute-only “public question time at all of our committee meetings, including Cabinet ...” with the claim that it “actively encouraged members of the public to speak.”
Quite what form this active encouragement takes eludes us.
But there you go.
Having said that, there are again hurdles to overcome.
It’s good to see that it’s not only UKIP that our Worst Street masters think deserve a hard time!
They don’t mind clubbing the electorate into silence as well.

***

Finally ... did you know that yesterday was Lincolnshire Day?
Not that it would matter if you lived in Boston, as we looked everywhere to see what celebrations were taking place locally, and could find none whatever.


You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com  Your e-mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested.
Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com