Boston Labour councillors have demanded that the Tory
leadership on the borough council removes all recent publicity referring to
donations made from the Lincolnshire County Council “Big Society” fund –
because they claim that it is being used as part of the Conservative campaign
in the run up to the County Council elections in June.
“These Conservative county councillors are being allowed to misuse the
Boston Borough Council website and staff, “says Labour Group Leader Paul
Gleeson.
“We are accusing them of misleading the public, as the money that
they are giving is county council money allocated to each councillor for the
sole purpose of supporting local groups.
“They should be advertising them on the county council
website – and not Boston Borough Council’s website, as the money has nothing to do with their
roles as borough councillors.
“So Boston Labour councillors are asking Boston Borough
Council to remove all these announcements about the big society from their
website immediately.
“Stop using Boston Borough Council for electioneering
purposes.
“Boston Borough Council should not be used for the
Conservative party’s county council election campaign.”
Certainly, the timing of these donations is interesting, to
say the least.
According to the Lincolnshire County Council website, between
September 2011 and the end of this month, all 77 county councillors were allocated £4,000
a year to give to local groups and community projects.
We sure that no-one needs reminding that of the 77 county
councillors, 62 are Conservative members – with just five Labour, four Lib Dems and six
Independents - so the project has to give the Tories an advantage of some kind in terms of image.
So far this year, three Conservative members of both the
borough and the county council have appeared on Boston Borough Council’s
website doling out cheques from the fund.
Council Leader Pete Bedford was featured just yesterday, and previously in January, whilst
fellow Cabinet members and joint deputy leaders Michael Brookes and Raymond
Singleton-McGuire have bobbed up three times and twice respectively in the past
few weeks.
Their pictures have also appeared in the borough council's “good
news” bulletin.
They certainly paint a warm picture of good-hearted generous
Conservative councillors, and it is worth asking why these donations
have come in such concentration and at such a late stage.
One can only speculate.
But a fact is that councillors cannot make any awards during
the period quaintly known as “purdah” which restricts publicity seeking
activity ahead of elections.
Purdah is the period between the notice of the election – to
be published on 26th March – and the date of the election on 2nd
May.
Contrast the rush to generosity of our local Tories with
donations by Boston West Independent County Councillor Ray Newell – the only non-Conservative Boston representative at County Hall – who had
disposed of most of his good causes cash before Christmas – without as far as
we can tell, much by way of a hoo-ha in the local papers.
Whilst it is certain that the local Conservative leadership
will reject the Labour group’s call, we cannot help but feel that it has some
merit in that the publicity plants an image in the minds of the electorate which – who can say –
might well prove influential at the ballot box.
You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com
Your e-mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if
requested.
Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
ReplyDeleteMichael Borrill March 13, 2013
ReplyDeleteThe question of the buses through the Market Place has reminded me of the "Tribal" report of 2007. This report,at great expense, provided the Council with a Boston Town Centre Study which was apart from the Transport Study. Over the years some of the details have been cast to the wayside, e.g. West Street development, but many of the recommendations still apply.
One of these was "more pedestrianisation" and less pedestrian/vehicle conflict.
"The pedestrian experience in the Market Place can be viewed as inadequate due to the presence of manoeuvering vehicles,through traffic(NO BUSES WHEN THIS REPORT WAS COMPILED) and the poor delineation of the pedestrian route across the Market Place.These issues lead to pedestrian/vehicle conflict and severance."
This was before buses and the revamp of the Market Place!
The report recommends:-
"Reduce pedestrian/vehicular conflict. Pedestrian priority should be a key part in any redesign of the Market Place. This does not necessarily mean excluding vehicles, but means that they should feel ""guests"" in a space that is ""owned"" by the pedestrian."
I suggest all Councillors read this report