However much the powers that be in Worst Street might wish, the issue of the Old Grey Mayor versus Value for Money, won’t go away.
A recent Freedom of Information request asking for a list of
official Mayoral engagements since May last year made interesting reading.
Broadly speaking it totalled 200 engagements – of which
around 60 involved scratching the backs of fellow mayors … often involving
quite a bit of time and travel in the process.
As an authority, Boston is one of seven districts under the
umbrella of Lincolnshire County Council.
But no end of smaller towns have mayors as well – and the
year saw trips to such places as Stamford, Market Deeping, Market Rasen and Bourne.
Most of these were events laid on apparently for the benefit
of other mayors – such things as dinners, ‘at homes’ or dare we utter the word
… balls.
Or how about a trip to Lincoln for the mayor’s “Whisky Tour?”
What a vital piece of inter county co-operation.
But events in Lincolnshire were still not enough.
The year saw civic visits to such far afield places as Kings
Lynn, Peterborough, Wisbech, Fenland District Council in March, Cambs, plus
Melton Mowbray, Downham Market and Newark.
Years ago, when we worked in the mainstream media, such
gatherings were referred to by the collective name of Chain Gangs.
They were nothing more than junkets for people who had been
honoured in their local communities wining and dining others of similar ilk as though
they were someone special.
All these junkets are paid for from the local council tax –
and don’t forget that all mayors have staff support, and an official car and
driver … who must spend hours every year covering long distances and waiting
below stairs which whichever Worshipsful they served wined and dined the night
away.
Of course, the mayor does play a local role as well, and in
Boston for the period under review a similar number of events of a local nature
were attended – anything from the opening of new shops and other premises to
events in schools.
Then there are a large number of events which the mayor
attends largely to fill a seat or two – things where his absence would go
unnoticed if he wasn’t there.
***
Recently, our current man in the Santa suit, Councillor
Stephen Woodliffe, said that it was an “amazing privilege” to be mayor – and
that the role represented and advertised Boston at home and away.
“The role of mayor raises the profile of Boston. Since being
mayor, I have noticed how much respect the public have for Boston elsewhere and
how appreciative they are for our support.” – including memorial services in
London.
Mr Woodliffe added that when he attends events locally,
people are “truly appreciative.”
Frankly, we think that many engagements could be done away
with – especially those that do nothing more than allow the mayor to swagger around
with his peer group.
In Boston, we think that this could save around £20,000 a
year – whilst collectively, across the legions of other councils who are
staging events for their own self-aggrandisement, the savings could run into
hundreds of thousands.
***
Having said all that it seems that councillors never lack a
point of view when it comes to their own sense of worth.
Along with the debate around the value of the mayoral
office, we were reminded that councillors and staff at Worst Street enjoy free
car parking – as come considerably expense to council taxpayers.
This prompted an e-mail from former Independent – a true
Indy, unlike the lip serving contingent we have these days – Carol Taylor, who
wrote: “In 2012 when I was a councillor for Witham ward, I brought up the
subject of car parking charges at a full council meeting with former Councillor
Raymond Singleton-McGuire in his role as finance portfolio holder.
“I had compiled my own research into the benefits of
charging council staff to park in their car park. The amount charged would be
in line with their earnings which is how the NHS charge their staff.
“I spoke to many of the staff informally, and they had no
objections to paying – as long as it was in line with their earnings.
“The worse response
was from elected councillors when I suggested we paid £3 a month – which
was met with absolute horror from those who did little or nothing and just
collected their monthly allowance.
“My calculations showed that there was a potential to raise
over £100,000 – but as you would expect it didn't go any further.
“I have to say, though, that Councillor Singleton-McGuire
welcomed my research and report and said it was something that could be
considered in the future.
“The majority of working people have to pay car parking charges,
and there are no reasons why council staff should not pay, either.
“Incidentally, staff who got their free space were only
those who worked in the municipal buildings, and I think it did not apply to
all council staff – which if true is totally unfair and
unacceptable!”
***
It seems that ex-councillors are doing more these days than
those in office.
Again we hear that former Labour group leader and ex-Mayor
Paul Kenny has come down hard on Worst Street – this time when it indulged in
some self-praise after an appearance by
so-called leader ‘Nipper’ Bedford at an
all-party parliamentary group session about integration.
Ironically, ‘Nipper’ said that one of the factors in the
Boston Brexit vote was a lack of
sensible debate about the issues, and too much of a shouting and point scoring
match between the opposing political factions.
In return, Mr Kenny has asked the council a number of
questions including ones about the lack of full implementation of all the
recommendations from the task and finish group on social population impact, and
the blocking and refusal to implement licensing of all houses in multiple occupation.
And he asks: “Why haven’t you run a major campaign to change
the law on off-licences with all local authorities within the East Midlands and
surrounding counties and called on the Conservative government to give the
people of Boston the same powers to ban drinking as has been done in some parts
of Scotland?
“Boston Borough Council should have been the most dynamic
and leading council in the country for its size around immigration and
migration but sadly they do not have the commitment or the willpower to do so,
which only lets the people of Boston down.”
Mr Kenny says he is asking the surviving members of the
Labour party on the council
scrutiny committees and BTAC, to look at some of these
issues “and make sure that we get proper scrutiny within our town.”
He concludes: “Unfortunately the Cabinet stops any debate
about improving our town, and is rude or dismissive if anybody questions the
decisions and actions of Boston Borough Council’s Cabinet. They use officers in
their media team to spin political messages which is totally inappropriate.
“If they wish to do political spin then the Tory councillors
should pay for it, not the people of Boston, and it is in breach of the
guidelines laid down for local government by using officers within their local
media team.”
And as far as his efforts to date are concerned, he tells Boston Eye: “I am still waiting for any
answers. I don't think I will hold my breath.”
***
As we remarked last week, clearly Mr Kenny has thrown his
hat in the ring for next year’s county council elections.
But there is now another – former Tory Worst Street bigwig
Yvonne Gunter, who was portfolio holder for leisure, has defected to the
Lincolnshire Independents.
She recently took part in a survey in the town which came to
the startling conclusion that market traders were worried about falling
business.
“Many were concerned that footfall and spend has reduced
over the years. Some stall holders had stopped coming, leaving gaps.
"Stall holders were very worried about shops closing,
especially the larger properties as they become dirty and uncared for which is
a bad image for the town.
"The lack of public toilets is a big concern to the
traders, especially sole traders, who find it very difficult to leave their
stall to go far. Some admitted allowing themselves to be dehydrated, rather
than having to find a loo."
She also listed the state of the Market Place surface, and
the use of Strait Bargate by buses – which is something that she may well once
have voted for.
She added: “"It appears Boston Borough Council are
addressing these issues after many meetings so we await their comments."
***
If by the latter, she means the council’s Preposterous Boston Task and Finish
group, then comments may well be all that we end up with – whenever the group
deigns to report and share its thoughts with the public.
Meanwhile, we hear that they are pressing ahead with the
idea of paying private business to make their toilet facilities available – but
while shiny baubles implying that thousands of pounds a year might change
hands, we understand that the reality is that much smaller sums are likely …
which in some cases would fail to cover the cost of providing the service.
***
There’s interesting news about our former UKIP candidate at
last year’s general election – Robin Hunter-Clarke, who started his political
“career” as a Conservative town councillor in Skegness before switching
loyalties..
Some while ago he decanted to Wales to serve the UKIP
assembly leader Neil (it’s in the bag) Hamilton as Chief of Staff.
Within the last few days he has announced his candidacy for
UKIP in the local elections in Gibbonsdown, Vale of Glamorgan.
Asked if this means that he has relinquished his role at a
Lincolnshire County Councillor, he said: “Yes, in May. I will finish my term and fulfil my commitment.”
Some have questioned the decision to stay at County Hall – which
may well prove challenging if Hunter-Clarke is lucky at the Welsh ballot box.
Recently, Mr Hunter-Clarke’s “commitment” has fallen to
attendances at two meetings out of the last five – but the allowances, at the
thick end of £7,500 a year, remain unchanged, of course..
As we asked a while ago … despite his promises, can we
really expect Mr Clarke to stand again at the next general election?
Interestingly, Mr H-C rates a mention in the current issue
of Private Eye – which observes that his
boss Hamilton continues to live in England and use UKIP money “to bolster UKIP
in England.”
Mrs Hunter-Clarke is described as a “Civil Litigator” in
RHC’s register of interests with Lincolnshire County Council.
***
Worst Street’s fondness for the iron fist in the iron glove
approach to problems earned the town more unwanted publicity last weekend –
when the Sunday Telegraph highlighted
its plan to criminalise people for nothing more serious than refusing to
produce a dog poo bag on demand.
Welcome to Boston – where if you’re not accosted by street
drinkers – you’ll need waders to struggle through the doggy droppings!
***
Finally – and still with Worst Street – we were amused by
the latest way that the council treats us all as though we were a ring-pull short
of a four pack.
Beneath the headline “Can you be the canned art project
winner?” (note the clever play on words)
the council website promotes “a project to develop artwork for Boston made from
recycled aluminium cans has been launched with a competition for 13 to
18-year-olds to design a logo.”
Witham Central and Carlton Road Neighbourhood Action Group, “a
resident-led community group helping to tackle anti-social behaviour and
undertaking environmental projects in the centre of Boston” has been awarded £15,000 by the Arts Council
and another £1,500 from the Royal Voluntary Service's Local People's Project to undertake the project along Haven Bank..
The "From the Stump to the Sluice" project will
involve the group and our old friends Transported,
commissioning a professional artist to create a series of themed, cast metal “finials”
made from melted down aluminium cans.
If there’s a better way to waste £16,500, we have yet to
encounter it – but what made us really smile was Worst Street’s naïve illustration
that accompanied the website piece.
Mention aluminium cans in the context of Boston’s reputation
and anti-social behaviour, and drink tins come to mind.
But not to the Worst Street “mind.”
The tins in their picture are all soft drink containers!
You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com Your e-mails will be treated in confidence
and published anonymously if requested.
Our former blog is archived at:
http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com
We are on Twitter
– visit @eye_boston
Sir
ReplyDeleteI feel that I must speak up about the Public Toilet closure issue which never seems to go away but the complaining continues. In 2012 I spent several weeks trying to prevent the closure of the toilets. I sat outside those toilets gathering information such as the numbers of people using these facilities. I sat outside on several market days as well as in the week when they were less busy. I put together this information and presented it at full council, after being in contact with several organisations and research into the increasing urological problems of so many people. I was stopped (not for long) by the then Mayor who cried out "do we have to listen to this"? I continued and presented significant statistical evidence to keep the toilets open. I spoke to the market traders for two weeks asking them what they thought about the closure. I was astounded at the couldn't care less attitude of these traders and the traders rep said he uses Oldrids toilets so he wasn't bothered. I set up a petition with the help of the Target and....just 2 people signed it. I also had letter of the week in the target on 8th August 2012 asking the public to fight against the closure as it would be futile to complain afterwards. There was no response.
The worst thing about this debacle is that had we been allowed to question the sale of the Assembly Rooms this could have been brought up and the new owners would have been open to discuss negotiations to retain the toilets.
This wasn't to be. Everyone had the chance to fight against this closure and as we have all witnessed, public opinion if strong enough, can turn the tide.
These toilets have gone and gone forever. The people of Boston should have fought harder, they didn't so need to stop complaining. They had the chance and they failed to act. It's as simple as that.
apologies for long response.
Carol Taylor