Questions have been asked about the way that Boston Borough Council is handling its bid for up to £25 million in government funding under the Town Deal Investment Plan in the wake of a bid for accelerated funding of £750,000 to kick-start some of the projects.

***

They come from a reader who is In The Know, has considerable knowledge of how all this works – and who feels that the public is being kept in the dark.

***

He also believes that one bid – to evaluate the PE21 Project announced a year ago this month and apparently in hibernation ever since – may well be nothing more than a face-saving exercise to justify killing the project off.

***

He told Boston Eye: “I read in the Boston bulletin that there’d been a full council meeting and that they were seeking this three quarters of a million pounds worth of accelerated project funding.

“That sounds like very good news for Boston, which is what we all want to hear.

“But I was quite intrigued as to how the projects had been chosen, so I looked at the full council report of 10^th August, and the report said that the offer was made on 1^st July with a deadline of 14^th August to respond.

“Surely between those dates there’s ample time to call a Zoom meeting of the Town Deal Board and to have a proper discussion about which projects should be selected towards the £¾ million bit.

***

“And that just didn’t seem to have happened, because reading further into the report,  it says at one point ‘there is an expectation that the council will consult or engage fully with the board of the Boston Town Deal in identifying the projects’ – and then it goes on to say that basically on 7^th July the board was asked what their thoughts were  … and so there was no request for a Zoom board meeting.

“And, of course, we don’t know what members of the Town Deal Board actually responded because that’s not covered within the report.

“We then jump to the conclusion that we’ve now told the Town Board these are the six projects that are going forward.

***

“Interestingly the most recent public meeting of the Town Deal Board was back on 29^th February, but there are still no minutes published from that meeting.

“I also understand that there have been general calls for expressions of interest from anyone who thought that they had a worthwhile project to submit it to the board for consideration as part of the forthcoming bid for £25 million with a closing date of 13^th March.

“But as far as I can see, there hasn’t been any publication of the expressions of interest that have been received.

***

“So, we don’t know how many there are; we don’t even know whether these six projects that have now been selected for the £¾ million actually formed any of the expressions of interest with the deadline of 13^th March.

“It’s not exactly transparent, is it?

***

The bids put forward to the council were for: The Haven High Academy 3G Pitch Development Project totalling £120,000, Boston College’s Digital, Transport and Logistics Academy – £182,976, Boston Town Heritage Projects – £277,700; Experience Boston: Travel, Trade and Influence – £80,000, PE21 Feasibility Funding – £50K, and The Sanctuary, Restore Church – £200,000 towards an inclusive community hub that will focus on supporting homeless and vulnerable people in the broadest sense

By our reckoning, this comes to £910,000 and a bit against a ceiling of £750.000.

***

Worst Street acknowledges this and says: “These projects will now be submitted to Government to ascertain their suitability for the accelerated funding.

“Whilst not all the projects will be able to access the funding, as their funding request exceeds the £750,000 allocation, there is still potential for those that miss out to be included in the Town Investment Plan which will submitted later this year.”

(This appears to say that some of them are not, which we thought would exclude them from the accelerated grant application -Ed).

***

Our reader has views on some of these projects.

Of the 3g pitch, he says – “to be honest, they are self-funding, and really don’t need public sector funding for a school to get into this.

“And I also don’t see how hits the three strands that you have to meet for the town deal funding in the first place.

“That was a surprise one to me.

***

“Some of these are quite chunky amounts of money.

“In the council report, the football pitch, for example, is seeking £120,000 – but that is only really to top up the Football Foundation funding which is the main source of funding.

***

“The Boston College project is £183,000, but I don’t think that I’d come across that before.

“But of course, in the public domain, we don’t know what bids or expressions of interest were received – as members of the public, we have never been told.

“We don’t know whether there were six of them; we don’t know whether there were 60 of them.”

***

He also has issues with the Restore church project.

“There is no mention of how that works with things like the night shelter at Centenary Methodist Church on Red Lion Street how it taps in to the Centrepoint Outreach facility – are they duplicating, are they working in partnership?

“We don’t know.”

***

So – how does he think this should have been done?

***

“For the £¾ million, my view is that they had plenty of time from 1^st July to contact the chairman of the Town Deal Board, convene a meeting and should have looked at all the expressions that had been received.

“By this stage one would have thought they knew how many there were because the closing date was  March, and they also ought to have some idea as to how they ranked them in order of priority so they actually fit with getting a chance of the £25 million   and the criteria attached to it..

***

“So, they could have then said: ‘We think these are the top ‘x’ number’ – because as I say, we don’t know, so therefore, as we’ve got a chance of £¾ million  and we think that these ones are actually deliverable and we can start getting them off the ground, the town board should have been making that recommendation or that approval  of the projects that they wanted – but this has been flipped on its head to me,  where the borough council have  decided.

“… call them their pet projects … PE21; working very closely with the college.

“But are these the right projects in comparison with the others?

“Maybe somebody, somewhere, has decided what to take forward for the £¾ million.

“Surely, if it’s part of the town deal overall picture it should be the Town Deal Board that is having a greater influence rather than it just sitting at the borough council and the Town Deal Board being told ‘this is what we’re doing’”.

***

“And this is my point:

“Who is the decision-maker?

“Who is the accountable body – because I don’t see that the two are necessarily the same?

***

He said that although the councillors ultimately approved it … “The chances are that they had a couple of days at best to read it along with all the other things that have been put under their noses 

“It looks fantastic on the face of it, and I’m not saying that they are necessarily the wrong projects.

“What I’m talking about is the process to get there.”

***

And he has an interesting point of view on the inclusion of funding to “evaluate” the apparently sleeping PE21 Project.

***

“The PE21 project is a reincarnation of a project from the mid-1990s called the Modus Project.

The developer was Modus from Manchester, and they were into massive lending from the Irish banks, so when we had the financial crash, that scheme got put to one side.

***

“This is really a resurrection of that – but when you read the report, it doesn’t mention the element of retail that is in there, nor the best type.

“It went out over a year ago and there was a feasibility report and a masterplan issued by the borough council which has basically sat gathering dust until now.

“So, it’s a year out of date, and in fact when you read the five elements of PE21, each and every one of those makes no economic sense whatsoever.

***

“Some won’t, because you may be talking about NHS facilities, and there is also talk about a leisure facility.

“Is that to replace the Geoff Moulder leisure centre?

“But where will all the money be coming from other than through PE21?

***

“One of the other elements was quite a lot of retail space within PE21 – but you can understand now, post-COVID, Marks and Spencer’s and Oldrids and the amount of retail space that we’ve got in the town centre … why on earth would you start building more off West Street?

“And the hotel.

“There’s no end user for it.

“Nobody wants it and again, financially, nobody in their right mind would ever see that getting off the ground.

***

“So, they’re going to spend £50,000 on a PE21 feasibility study – and I just wonder whether they’re almost looking for a way to say ‘you know what, this is dead in the water’.

“They possibly are looking for a way out, because they built it up, then it’s all gone very quiet.

“It didn’t gain that amount of public support in the first place with things like the relocation of the bus station – it takes the bus station potentially down to the railway station, so further out of town and loss of car parking.

***

“If there was a closing date of 13^th March, what’s happened to all those expressions of interest?  Have they all just been thrown away because they’re concentrating on these six now?

“And have there been even any board meetings that are not in the public domain – because, surely there would have had been the usual public notice that the board was meeting … even if the first item was to exclude the public because of it being a confidential item.

***

“I just wonder whether there had been a further meeting that was a confidential meeting that maybe gave a bit of priority to all the expressions of interest but it’s still not in the public domain

“I accept that maybe some of these projects are commercially sensitive – but you can give it a one-liner so that people see the sort of magnitude or the lack of expressions of interest that have come forward.

“But there’s nothing.

“It’s just silence.

***

“Contrast that with the Skegness and Mablethorpe Town Deal – they met on 27^th January, 6^th March, 20^th May, 29^th May and the 3^rd June.

“You go on their website and all the minutes are there.

“Boston has a strategic partnership, so surely they should be aligning themselves to work in a very similar way.

“East Lindsey has been seeking public consultation on bids going forward and holding public Zoom meetings where you can join in the debate … what a contrast.”

You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com

E– mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested.

Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com

We are on Twitter – visit @eye_boston

So, what do we make of the new cabinet?

***

Will it rise phoenix-like from the ashes of its predecessor …? 

***

Or will it cast the leader in the role of Wile E Coyote and blow up in his face?

***

Time will tell – but the fact is that the cabinet has now increased in size from six to eight members, with leader Councillor Paul Skinner hinting that another new cabinet position was “likely” to be created in September.

***

So, who are the new brooms that will be giving Boston a much-needed clean sweeping?

***

Let’s do this back to front, and tell you first what hasn’t changed.

***

The leader is still the leader – with the Herculean task at the top of his list that of “Performance and Improvement”

The deputy – Councillor Nigel Welton (who actually seems to have been leader in all but name for some while) remains the deputy.

Councillor David Brown remains in charge of tourism, arts and culture – which peculiarly includes allotments as part of the brief.

Councillor Martin Griggs stays with housing – which once included allotments – and Councillor Yvonne Stevens continues with the portfolio for rubbish and death.

***

So, who’s new?

***

Enter Councillor Jonathan Noble – a one-time UKIPper who even stood for parliament for the party in Louth in 2017.

He takes on finance – one of the most important portfolios – from Councillor Martin Howard … and will doubtless find that 27 years as a history teacher followed by teaching the guitar between writing music, poetry, plays and short stories will stand him in good stead for overseeing a multi-million-pound budget.

***

Interestingly, at the “extraordinary” council meeting which saw Councillor Skinner’s leadership challenged, Mr Noble was nominated by Councillor Stevens for leader in the event that the meeting’s choice – Councillor Stephen Woodliffe, failed to get elected … which of course, he did.

Pay attention, please – we’ll be asking questions afterwards.

***

Next among the newbies is Councillor Tracey Abbott, who takes on the town centre portfolio previously held by Councillor Chelcei Sharman.

***

Finally – and perhaps appropriately – a new cabinet role covering heritage has been given to  a member who almost counts as part of the borough’s heritage after so many years as a councillor … Richard Austin.

***

So – will the new-look cabinet be Chippendale or IKEA?

***

A number of things about it strike us as interesting.

The membership has risen from six to eight – with the hint that a ninth post will be announced next month.
If  that happens it will cost taxpayer an extra £16,830 in special responsibility allowances.

***

We can take an educated guess at what the ninth  job might involve, since we understand that Councillor Peter Bedford – who told last week’s extraordinary council meeting that he had declined the deputy leadership – is also believed to have been offered a role dealing with the proposed Government reorganisation that would presumably come with the creation of unitary authorities.

***

Whatever the job – we might soon have a situation where the odd man out at Worst Street will be the one who isn’t a member of the cabinet!

***

Raising cabinet numbers to eight sees 26% of the 30 members in a commanding post – and adding one more next month will bring this to 30%

At last week’s meeting, Councillor Paul Goodale stayed awake long enough to express the wish that Worst Street would ditch the cabinet system in favour of the old committee structure.

At this rate his wish may be granted sooner than he thinks!

***

Looking behind the job descriptions, we have to ask how the new cabinet members might get along.

***

New member Jonathan Noble ought certainly to work well with Councillor Yvonne Stevens ... another former UKIPper.

Not only did she nominate him for leader last week, but we understand that she also circulated his name ahead of the meeting as means to allow Leader Skinner and Deputy Welton “to stand down with as much dignity as possible”.

***

Oops – they’re still standing up – moreover, they haven’t budged an inch from the cabinet posts they held previously.

To us, it’s more of a surprise that Councillor Stevens remains in the cabinet.

But there you go.

***

Councillor Tracey Abbott becomes the second consecutive town centre portfolio holder not to represent a town centre ward which – whilst it doesn’t make the job impossible – certainly must make the learning curve steeper.

***

And a fellow cabinet member – David Brown ... another Kipper turned Tory – is the man she beat by four votes in Wyberton Ward 15 months ago, leaving him in political isolation until a by-election at the end of last year saw him make a comeback in Kirton and Frampton.

We seem to recall that he was more than a little miffed soon after he lost Wyberton in May 2019 when Independent Councillor Abbott subsequently announced her alliance with the Tories

So, can he forgive and forget?

***

And now we come to councillor Richard Austin.

Leader Paul Skinner has reportedly said that Councillor Austin’s move had been planned prior to last week’s meeting but COVID-19 had delayed the changes.

***

As he doesn’t mention dates, we have to stick with our thought that this appointment has the tang of a deal about it.

***

It was only a month ago that Councillor Austin was stirring things up with the circulation of a letter signed by all non-Conservative councillors declaring: “We will not support any alliance without first having adequate time to analyse the proposals in depth.”

He was referring, of course to the alliance with East Lindsey District Council – which was a fait accompli even then … and is now meeting to plan a way forward.

Talk of launching a judicial review to challenge the way the alliance was created without much consultation with councillors at large turned out to be so much hot air.

***

Then – voila – Councillor Austin appears as a member of the cabinet.

***

Heritage has always found a place on the portfolio list in the past, without the need to make it a specific brief.

And normally, portfolio roles cover a number of areas.

Paul Skinner has eleven, Nigel Welton nine, Jonathan Noble eight, David Brown eight, Yvonne Stevens seven, Tracey Abbott BTAC liaison plus four, and Martin Griggs covers eight areas

But Councillor Austin only has “heritage and conservation” – two words where really one will do.

***

But it puts him in the cabinet, and if you’re in the cabinet then you really have to go along with the leadership.

We are reminded of the impolite expression that says it’s better to have someone inside the tent pi**ing out than outside the tent pi**ing in.

***

But Councillor Skinner shares none of our concerns.

His official line is: “I have been very lucky to have a vigorous and inspiring cabinet since becoming leader and the change of portfolios is intended to clarify roles as we come out of lockdown and into the recovery phase of the coronavirus crisis.

“We are a motivated council who deliver to all of our residents and I want to make sure that we continue to do this in an appropriate manner.

“I would like to welcome our three new members on board who will all bring their own special skills to their cabinet areas.

“This is a strong cabinet and we will deliver for our borough.”

***

Clearly a Chippendale rather an IKEA man!

***

Finally, our last blog struck a chord with former Councillor Carol Taylor – who quit the Tory group soon after her election in 2011 to become Independent – in the days when the name meant what it said.

She e-mailed Boston Eye from her new home in Cornwall to say: “I still keep in touch with what is happening in Boston. This is through my family who live there but also through your blog.

“I was a hopeless political councillor, but when I became an Independent, I worked so very hard to achieve many things with the people of Witham ward.

“When I decided to leave the Conservative group, some of them were so very, very cruel.

“I am saddened to see that some current councillors are suffering the vitriolic rants of their peers.

“During my time as an Independent, I wanted to be chair of one of the scrutiny committees, and I was convinced that I had a really good chance of getting this.

“I spoke to several other councillors who were more than happy to support my nomination.

“The night before the meeting, I received a phone call from a councillor to say that he was so sorry but I wouldn't be getting his vote because he had been offered a chairman’s position in the future.

“Another councillor, whom I had tea with the day before, assured me that I had their vote.

“The next day when the meeting started, this councillor came into the room and didn't acknowledge me at all.

“When it came to the voting......yes, you've guessed it, I didn't get their vote after all. 
“As it happened, the chair went to the best choice – but it was the sheer cruelty of other councillors which made it so hard for me to handle.

“It is very disappointing when councillors are offered sweeteners just to feed the egos of those in ‘higher office’

However, whilst they are self-adulating, the ones who accept these are worse than them, that they choose to take what they see as a better offer rather than go with their so-called strong beliefs and opinions and what is in the best interest of those who voted for them.

“Thank you for mentioning the ‘Maverick Incident’.  It’s good to see that my film is out later this year!

“Finally, I would like to appeal to all councillors to stop voicing your anger, spitefulness, disrespect for each other and ultimately betraying your constituents on social media. Use your qualities to serve the people of Boston,

“I'm sure you will find it very rewarding.”

You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com

E– mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested.

Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com

We are on Twitter – visit @eye_boston 

 

In recent months, Worst Street has come up with more bollocks than you’d find in a vet’s dustbin at the end of National Cat Neutering Week – and in many ways, last night’s umpteenth “extraordinary” meeting of the full council continued the trend.

*** 

Regular readers will recall that the idea was to pass a vote of no confidence in the ruling Tory administration and elect a new – unspecified – leader to replace Councillor Paul Skinner.

 ***

But, as we reported last week, the proposer – Councillor Peter Bedford – had planned to withdraw the move, and, again as we predicted, left it too late under the rules.

 ***

He opened by saying how sorry he was on behalf of the five who brought the motion for the people of Boston because of the way that things have gone in the last fortnight or so.
Originally, he said he was going to ask for the motion to be deferred or removed but was told he couldn’t … “but as things have moved on with all the ducking and diving and things that have been going on, with promises here and promises there” he asked to amend to motion to one of no confidence in the lead8er and move that Councillor Stephen Woodliffe became leader until the 2023 elections ... “if we are still a stand-alone council by that time.” 

***

But more was to come …
Portfolio holder Councillor Yvonne Stevens proposed Councillor Jonathan Noble to be the leader if the no confidence vote was successful.
Councillor Noble is now a Tory – having been elected in the UKIP  near-landslide at Worst Street, and also standing for UKIP in the Horncastle and Louth general election in 2017

 ***

After Councillor Woodliffe read a less than impassioned speech accepting the nomination, the meeting got into its stride.

 ***

Councillor Alison Austin declared “This sort of thing must stop. This council can’t keep playing ping-pong with leaders any more.” 

She said that councillors had to unite behind whoever becomes leader … “or we become the laughingstock of the county (too late - Ed) and be likely to be taken into special measures.”

***

Councillor Neill Hastie told the meeting that: “Leaders are coming and going more like kebabs out of a kebab shop” – and that people should rally round behind whoever was elected and get round to putting Boston first and improving the town.

 ***

Councillor Deborah Evans talked about the e-mails that had come through and the “cruel words” that had been said.
“I feel like I’m back at school and there’s bullying going on”
For her, Paul Skinner has been “amazing”; available seven days a week, with problems usually sorted within the same day.
“I don’t know how he does it.
“I’m just really impressed”.

 ***

Councillor Paul Goodale called for an end to the cabinet system and return to committee structure.

 ***

Councillor Judith Skinner declared: “Some may say I’m biased, but Paul has the best interests of Boston at heart. Sometimes his directness is perceived as brusqueness. He just likes to do things as quickly and openly as possible. 
“I am very distressed at some of the hateful e-mails he has received., and they are bordering on a hate crime, I would say.” 
“So, whatever happens to night Paul has done the best for Boston that he possibly could”. 

***

Councillor Tom Ashton continued the theme.
“Paul cares very deeply about the town, about the borough and I stand full-square behind him”
But having said that, he agreed that the way the alliance was handled should have been done better.
But again, he mentioned the sinister undertones that have accompanied the debacles of recent months.
It was “deeply saddening, the depths to which some of the conversations, some of the e-mails, some of the debates have plunged on this council.”
He said that he hoped they could move and draw a line under the personal attacks and criticisms, “whether they be in this chamber, whether it’s hawking a dossier around on me around drainage boards, be it on Facebook. This stuff has to stop.”
Councillor Skinner was a “damn good man at heart”, who should be given the chance to work beyond the evening and bring the council together in the future.

***

A fulsome paean of praise for Councillor Skinner which included falling on his own sword to take the blame came from deputy leader Councillor Nigel Welton.
He said that the East Lindsey alliance talks were in place when Councillor Skinner became leader and that he was the man who steered it though.
“If anyone wants to criticise the leader, I think you’re criticising the wrong person. It’s me you should be criticising, not Councillor Skinner”.
He agreed that mistakes had been made and said lessons will be learned.
All the blame was his.
Councillor Skinner was an honourable man who works very hard for the council and did not deserve the kind of “venom” that has been thrown at him over the last couple of months.
And it seems that Councillor Welton was not immune to this either, as he ended by referring to ‘phone calls from another area saying that people in this council had been asking for “dirt on him” to throw at Councillor Skinner.

 ***

Councillor Anne Dorrian – regrettably appearing in audio only due to a technical defect – reminded people that Councillor Skinner stabbed Councillor Aaron Spencer, his predecessor as leader, in the 
back, and the very people who supported Councillor Skinner at the meeting were the people who signed the document to remove Councillor Spencer from the leadership.
At that time Councillor Spacer had reached out across the chamber, with everyone working well together (we must have missed that bit – Ed) and Councillor Skinner took “a wrecking ball” to that for 
his own personal gain supported by Nigel Welton.
After the alliance “fiasco”, Ms Dorrian wrote to all members suggesting that they downed their metaphorical weapons and worked together but received no response from the leader or deputy.

 ***

Summing up at the end of the debate, Councillor Bedford mentioned that one young councillor had resigned her position earlier in the day because her role was being “hawked around” without talking to her aboout it.
“Now that is disgraceful, it really is”.
And he concluded: “Even at 12-30pm today I got a call offering me the deputy leadership if I would vote another way tonight.”

*** 

Councillor Skinner replied that he did not “hawk” cabinet positions – there were now eight, where previously, there had been six.
That’s another £11,000 of taxpayers’ money being put to good use.

*** 

Councillor Hastie intervened before the vote to say:” Councillor Skinner has actually rung me to offer me the Town Centre portfolio if I allied with the Conservatives.

*** 

Councillor Skinner shot back with a slightly inaudible comment that sounded like: “It wasn’t, Mr Mayor. It was actually regulatory.”

*** 

Three councillors were missing from the meeting.
Michael Cooper and Martin Howard sent apologies, whilst Aaron Spencer, for whom we were supposed to feel so bereft, neither turned up nor apologised – and not for the first time.

*** 

Make of it what you will.
We were appalled to hear  about the disgraceful behaviour of some people, whose viciousness apparently bordered on hate crime, which is, of course a matter for the courts.
People such as this have no right to a position of authority that accords them status and respect as decent and honourable members of community, and we hope that they will have learned their lesson. 

*** 

Councillors were not alone when it came to the distribution of malinformation – here at Boston Eye, we received several unsolicited e-mails telling us about the alleged misdemeanours of a number of the key players.
And where they were signed, it was interesting to note the reaction when we declined to pick up their ball and run with it.

*** 

At the end of that particular meeting – an “ordinary” one followed after a wee break – the voting was 13 votes to install Councillor Woodliffe and 14 to keep Councillor Skinner in charge.
So the Tory status quo maintains by the skin of the teeth – but with the announcement of a changed and enlarged cabinet … the details of which will doubtless appear at some future date.

*** 

So, will we now see glasnost – or skrytnost?
Openness and transparency, or reticence?
The meeting talked more about the mistrust and abuse that has been going on than a way forward out of this mire, and somehow, we don’t see that watching councillors winding their bowels out on a stick in public will bring much change.
But we are sure it will be at the top of Councillor Skinner’s to do list.

*** 

And one final point.
We would strongly urge all councillors to watch the recording of  yesterday's meeting – because we are sure that many of them have no idea of how much of what they are doing is caught on camera.

*** 

Runner-up awards from last night go to Councillors Alison and Richard Austin and Councillor Paul Goodale, who briefly appeared underwhelmed by the proceedings.

But the winner on the night has to be from the Zoom picture display captioned as Tim Leader – Deputy Chief Executive (Strategy) in the new allied council.
His screenshots over time went like this … 

It certainly enlivened our viewing!

You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com

E– mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested. 

Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com 

We are on Twitter – visit @eye_boston

With unfailing regularity, Worst Street continues to refine and embellish the book of How Not To Do It.  

*** 

Regular readers will recall that our last edition reported on the call for yet another extraordinary meeting of the full council – set for Monday night – to declare a vote of no confidence in the Conservative leadership and to elect a new leader to replace Councillor Paul Skinner. 

 *** 

The proposer of this was himself a former leader and one-time Tory veteran, Councillor Peter Bedford, who spelt out his reasoning in an e-mail to Boston Eye. 

*** 

“I am the proposer quite simply because of the mess that this administration have put us in. 

“I always have supported the idea of joined-up working with East Lindsey District Council and hopefully South Holland District Council as well. 

“But the whole manner of the way that this has been put together is a disaster; non-consultation with Phil Drury (the former Chief Executive) and senior staff members, and of course members. 

“People outside of cabinet have not seen the written agreement with ELDC so if there are any shocks in there then it falls squarely on the Leader and Deputy. 

“We need a complete change of style as the Tory Administration are very weak and inexperienced”. 

 *** 

 This is what is called an unambiguous response. 

 *** 

Last week we quoted from Lewis Carroll’s much-loved work Alice in Wonderland. 

And we do so again this week – with a line from the girl herself – which neatly sets the scene for tonight’s meeting. 

*** 

 “Curiouser and curiouser”. 

 *** 

We understand that Councillor Bedford – after being so clear-cut about his reasoning – will tonight be withdrawing his proposal … which will surely see the status quo maintain and the Tories remain in charge. 

 *** 

The rule under which this motion was submitted calls for the signatures of at least five members – so this is obviously not a case of Councillor Bedford acting in some fit of pique. 

The seconder was Councillor Brian Rush, who told Boston Eye that he had “many other” concerns, but the main one was the “secretive” way in which the outgoing and incoming Chief Executive Officer were installed. 

*** 

That leaves at least three other opposition councillors gripping their crayons to place their ‘X’ on the proposal … and perhaps more. 

*** 

 So why the change of heart? 

*** 

We can only speculate – but it seems certain that we can rule out the idea that the opposition suddenly either felt guilty at the idea of capsizing the Tory boat or, after months of roughing up Councillor Skinner, decided to it wasn’t worth the candle. 

*** 

So, we are left with the almost inescapable conclusion that some sort of deal is in the offing. 

*** 

It’s not exactly rocket science; there’s really no other explanation, and if that turns out to be the case, it makes all the words of protest ring hollow. 

Just over three weeks ago, every opposition councillor signed an open letter to voters making it clear that whilst they were not opposed to a strategic alliance between Boston and “another district council”, they would not support any alliance without first having “adequate time” to analyse the proposals in depth. 

*** 

They attacked the “secrecy and haste” of the decision-making process, and concluded: “We are very concerned about the future of our Borough: your Borough. We are deeply worried about the preservation of Boston’s heritage, independence, and unique identity. “The question is, of course, “Who do you think runs your Borough now?” 

*** 

Well, if the proposal before Monday’s meeting is withdrawn, the answer is: “The Conservative administration”. 

*** 

What a climb-down by our so-called opposition – especially if we subsequently find out that the Tories have slipped the noose with their connivance. 

 *** 

We asked Councillor Bedford why he had called off the attack dogs, and received the reply: “No comment at this stage; just watch on Monday Night”. 

*** 

And if you want to do that, Worst Street has a link for you to follow. 

Just click here …

*** 

We also asked seconder Councillor Rush for a comment ... but received no reply.

*** 

So why still go ahead with the meeting? 

We think that the answer must be in the rule book. 

The motion that was proposed for Monday night had to be delivered to the Chief Executive not later than seven working days before the date of the meeting. 

Whilst we don’t have precise dates for the machinery of all this, we think that having made the proposal, the opposition did whatever it did that caused the change of mind – but then found that this was within the deadline required and therefore the meeting had to remain on the agenda to be withdrawn on the night. 

This says much about the mindset of the “opposition” – and perhaps more about the rigidity that prevents the cancellation of a pointless meeting simply because “the rules say so”. 

*** 

Meanwhile – enjoy Monday night’s meeting. 

And watch this space afterwards … we’ll be back with our account of events as soon as possible. 

 You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com E– mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested. 

Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com 

 We are on Twitter – visit @eye_boston