Friday 21 August 2020

Questions have been asked about the way that Boston Borough Council is handling its bid for up to £25 million in government funding under the Town Deal Investment Plan in the wake of a bid for accelerated funding of £750,000 to kick-start some of the projects.

***

They come from a reader who is In The Know, has considerable knowledge of how all this works – and who feels that the public is being kept in the dark.

***

He also believes that one bid – to evaluate the PE21 Project announced a year ago this month and apparently in hibernation ever since – may well be nothing more than a face-saving exercise to justify killing the project off.

***

He told Boston Eye: “I read in the Boston bulletin that there’d been a full council meeting and that they were seeking this three quarters of a million pounds worth of accelerated project funding.
“That sounds like very good news for Boston, which is what we all want to hear.
“But I was quite intrigued as to how the projects had been chosen, so I looked at the full council report of 10th August, and the report said that the offer was made on 1st July with a deadline of 14th August to respond.
“Surely between those dates there’s ample time to call a Zoom meeting of the Town Deal Board and to have a proper discussion about which projects should be selected towards the £¾ million bit.

***

“And that just didn’t seem to have happened, because reading further into the report,  it says at one point ‘there is an expectation that the council will consult or engage fully with the board of the Boston Town Deal in identifying the projects’ – and then it goes on to say that basically on 7th July the board was asked what their thoughts were  … and so there was no request for a Zoom board meeting.
“And, of course, we don’t know what members of the Town Deal Board actually responded because that’s not covered within the report.
“We then jump to the conclusion that we’ve now told the Town Board these are the six projects that are going forward.

***

“Interestingly the most recent public meeting of the Town Deal Board was back on 29th February, but there are still no minutes published from that meeting.
“I also understand that there have been general calls for expressions of interest from anyone who thought that they had a worthwhile project to submit it to the board for consideration as part of the forthcoming bid for £25 million with a closing date of 13th March.
“But as far as I can see, there hasn’t been any publication of the expressions of interest that have been received.

***

“So, we don’t know how many there are; we don’t even know whether these six projects that have now been selected for the £¾ million actually formed any of the expressions of interest with the deadline of 13th March.
It’s not exactly transparent, is it?

***


The bids put forward to the council were for: The Haven High Academy 3G Pitch Development Project totalling £120,000, Boston College’s Digital, Transport and Logistics Academy – £182,976, Boston Town Heritage Projects – £277,700; Experience Boston: Travel, Trade and Influence – £80,000, PE21 Feasibility Funding – £50K, and The Sanctuary, Restore Church – £200,000 towards an inclusive community hub that will focus on supporting homeless and vulnerable people in the broadest sense
By our reckoning, this comes to £910,000 and a bit against a ceiling of £750.000.


***

Worst Street acknowledges this and says: “These projects will now be submitted to Government to ascertain their suitability for the accelerated funding.
“Whilst not all the projects will be able to access the funding, as their funding request exceeds the £750,000 allocation, there is still potential for those that miss out to be included in the Town Investment Plan which will submitted later this year.”
(This appears to say that some of them are not, which we thought would exclude them from the accelerated grant application -Ed).

***

Our reader has views on some of these projects.
Of the 3g pitch, he says – “to be honest, they are self-funding, and really don’t need public sector funding for a school to get into this.
“And I also don’t see how hits the three strands that you have to meet for the town deal funding in the first place.
“That was a surprise one to me.

***

“Some of these are quite chunky amounts of money.
“In the council report, the football pitch, for example, is seeking £120,000 – but that is only really to top up the Football Foundation funding which is the main source of funding.

***

“The Boston College project is £183,000, but I don’t think that I’d come across that before.
“But of course, in the public domain, we don’t know what bids or expressions of interest were received – as members of the public, we have never been told.
“We don’t know whether there were six of them; we don’t know whether there were 60 of them.”

***

He also has issues with the Restore church project.
“There is no mention of how that works with things like the night shelter at Centenary Methodist Church on Red Lion Street how it taps in to the Centrepoint Outreach facility – are they duplicating, are they working in partnership?
“We don’t know.”

***

So – how does he think this should have been done?

***

“For the £¾ million, my view is that they had plenty of time from 1st July to contact the chairman of the Town Deal Board, convene a meeting and should have looked at all the expressions that had been received.
“By this stage one would have thought they knew how many there were because the closing date was  March, and they also ought to have some idea as to how they ranked them in order of priority so they actually fit with getting a chance of the £25 million   and the criteria attached to it..

***

“So, they could have then said: ‘We think these are the top ‘x’ number’ – because as I say, we don’t know, so therefore, as we’ve got a chance of £¾ million  and we think that these ones are actually deliverable and we can start getting them off the ground, the town board should have been making that recommendation or that approval  of the projects that they wanted – but this has been flipped on its head to me,  where the borough council have  decided.
“… call them their pet projects … PE21; working very closely with the college.
“But are these the right projects in comparison with the others?
“Maybe somebody, somewhere, has decided what to take forward for the £¾ million.
“Surely, if it’s part of the town deal overall picture it should be the Town Deal Board that is having a greater influence rather than it just sitting at the borough council and the Town Deal Board being told ‘this is what we’re doing’”.

***

“And this is my point:
“Who is the decision-maker?
“Who is the accountable body – because I don’t see that the two are necessarily the same?

***

He said that although the councillors ultimately approved it … “The chances are that they had a couple of days at best to read it along with all the other things that have been put under their noses 
“It looks fantastic on the face of it, and I’m not saying that they are necessarily the wrong projects.
“What I’m talking about is the process to get there.”

***

And he has an interesting point of view on the inclusion of funding to “evaluate” the apparently sleeping PE21 Project.

***

“The PE21 project is a reincarnation of a project from the mid-1990s called the Modus Project.
The developer was Modus from Manchester, and they were into massive lending from the Irish banks, so when we had the financial crash, that scheme got put to one side.

***

“This is really a resurrection of that – but when you read the report, it doesn’t mention the element of retail that is in there, nor the best type.
“It went out over a year ago and there was a feasibility report and a masterplan issued by the borough council which has basically sat gathering dust until now.
“So, it’s a year out of date, and in fact when you read the five elements of PE21, each and every one of those makes no economic sense whatsoever.

***

“Some won’t, because you may be talking about NHS facilities, and there is also talk about a leisure facility.
“Is that to replace the Geoff Moulder leisure centre?
“But where will all the money be coming from other than through PE21?

***

“One of the other elements was quite a lot of retail space within PE21 – but you can understand now, post-COVID, Marks and Spencer’s and Oldrids and the amount of retail space that we’ve got in the town centre … why on earth would you start building more off West Street?
“And the hotel.
“There’s no end user for it.
“Nobody wants it and again, financially, nobody in their right mind would ever see that getting off the ground.

***

“So, they’re going to spend £50,000 on a PE21 feasibility study – and I just wonder whether they’re almost looking for a way to say ‘you know what, this is dead in the water’.
“They possibly are looking for a way out, because they built it up, then it’s all gone very quiet.
“It didn’t gain that amount of public support in the first place with things like the relocation of the bus station – it takes the bus station potentially down to the railway station, so further out of town and loss of car parking.

***

“If there was a closing date of 13th March, what’s happened to all those expressions of interest?  Have they all just been thrown away because they’re concentrating on these six now?
“And have there been even any board meetings that are not in the public domain – because, surely there would have had been the usual public notice that the board was meeting … even if the first item was to exclude the public because of it being a confidential item.

***

“I just wonder whether there had been a further meeting that was a confidential meeting that maybe gave a bit of priority to all the expressions of interest but it’s still not in the public domain
“I accept that maybe some of these projects are commercially sensitive – but you can give it a one-liner so that people see the sort of magnitude or the lack of expressions of interest that have come forward.
“But there’s nothing.
“It’s just silence.

***

“Contrast that with the Skegness and Mablethorpe Town Deal – they met on 27th January, 6th March, 20th May, 29th May and the 3rd June.
“You go on their website and all the minutes are there.
“Boston has a strategic partnership, so surely they should be aligning themselves to work in a very similar way.
“East Lindsey has been seeking public consultation on bids going forward and holding public Zoom meetings where you can join in the debate … what a contrast.”



You can write to us at boston.eye@googlemail.com
E– mails will be treated in confidence and published anonymously if requested.
Our former blog is archived at: http://bostoneyelincolnshire.blogspot.com

We are on Twitter – visit @eye_boston




No comments:

Post a Comment