I see the Boston sub-Standard ‘on-line edition’ hastily dropped the story as soon as one or two readers’ less than complimentary comments started appearing.
The fact that the Worst Street ‘brains trust’ have scored a perfect own goal on this one cannot be avoided, however. One would like to think that the survey/consultation in question will be replaced with a more credible alternative, accompanied by a suitable apology for having tried to hoodwink the Boston rate payer. Fat chance of that happening, though.
quod erat demonstrandum - uttering the terms integrity and Worst Street in the same breath is oxymoronic ...
ReplyDeleteI see the Boston sub-Standard ‘on-line edition’ hastily dropped the story as soon as one or two readers’ less than complimentary comments started appearing.
ReplyDeleteThe fact that the Worst Street ‘brains trust’ have scored a perfect own goal on this one cannot be avoided, however. One would like to think that the survey/consultation in question will be replaced with a more credible alternative, accompanied by a suitable apology for having tried to hoodwink the Boston rate payer. Fat chance of that happening, though.